Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 590

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel Citric Acid‐Based Biodegradable Elastomers for Tissue Engineering

Yang, J., Webb, A. R., Ameer, G. A.·2004·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The synthesis and characterization of novel biodegradable elastomers, exemplified by poly(1,8‐octanediol‐ co‐citric acid), is reported. Biodegradation, mechanical, and biocompatibility data suggest very good potential for use as porous scaffolds in cardiovascular tissue engineering (see Figure). Material properties can be tailored by modulating the monomer ratio and post‐polymerization conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.200306264

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 590

Metadata

Authors
Yang, J., Webb, A. R., & Ameer, G. A.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-18
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
511-516
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2045413581
Cited by
590
References
1
FWCI
6.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel Citric Acid‐Based Biodegradable Elastomers for Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.200306264
The paper
Yang, J., Webb, A. R., & Ameer, G. A. (2004). Novel Citric Acid‐Based Biodegradable Elastomers for Tissue Engineering. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200306264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.