Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Autonomic Restoration of Electrical Conductivity

Blaiszik, Benjamin J., Kramer, Sharlotte L. B., Grady, Martha E., McIlroy, David A., Moore, Jeffrey S., Sottos, Nancy R., White, Scott R.·2012·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Self-healing of an electrical circuit is demonstrated with nearly full recovery of conductance less than one millisecond after damage. Crack damage breaks a conductive pathway in a multilayer device, interrupting electron transport and simultaneously rupturing adjacent microcapsules containing gallium-indium liquid metal (top). The released liquid metal flows to the area of damage, restoring the conductive pathway (bottom).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201102888

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Blaiszik, B. J., Kramer, S. L. B., Grady, M. E., McIlroy, D. A., Moore, J. S., Sottos, N. R., & White, S. R.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-20
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
398-401
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W2080776614
Cited by
321
References
0
FWCI
11.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autonomic Restoration of Electrical Conductivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201102888
The paper
Blaiszik, B. J., Kramer, S. L. B., Grady, M. E., McIlroy, D. A., Moore, J. S., Sottos, N. R., & White, S. R. (2012). Autonomic Restoration of Electrical Conductivity. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102888

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.