The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Yolk–Shelled C@Fe3O4 Nanoboxes as Efficient Sulfur Hosts for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Abstract
Owing to the high theoretical specific capacity (1675 mA h g−1) and low cost, lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries offer advantages for next‐generation energy storage. However, the polysulfide dissolution and low electronic conductivity of sulfur cathodes limit the practical application of Li–S batteries. To address such issues, well‐designed yolk–shelled carbon@Fe 3 O 4 (YSC@Fe 3 O 4) nanoboxes as highly efficient sulfur hosts for Li–S batteries are reported here. With both physical entrapment by carbon shells and strong chemical interaction with Fe 3 O 4 cores, this unique architecture immobilizes the active material and inhibits diffusion of the polysulfide intermediates. Moreover, due to their high conductivity, the carbon shells and the polar Fe 3 O 4 cores facilitate fast electron/ion transport and promote continuous reactivation of the active material during the charge/discharge process, resulting in improved electrochemical utilization and reversibility. With these merits, the S/YSC@Fe 3 O 4 cathodes support high sulfur content (80 wt%) and loading (5.5 mg cm−2) and deliver high specific capacity, excellent rate capacity, and long cycling stability. This work provides a new perspective to design a carbon/metal‐oxide‐based yolk–shelled framework as a high sulfur‐loading host for advanced Li–S batteries with superior electrochemical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Self-citationA highly efficient polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries
Liang, X., Hart, C., Pang, Q., Garsuch, A., Weiss, T., & Nazar, L. F. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6682 · Cited by 2,062
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Progress and Prospects
Manthiram, A., Chung, S., & Zu, C. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201405115 · Cited by 1,620
Self-citationCatalytic oxidation of Li 2 S on the surface of metal sulfides for Li−S batteries
Zhou, G., Tian, H., Jin, Y., Tao, X., Liu, B., Zhang, R., Seh, Z. W., Zhuo, D., Liu, Y., Sun, J., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1615837114 · Cited by 1,278
Sulfur Cathodes Based on Conductive MXene Nanosheets for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Liang, X., Garsuch, A., & Nazar, L. F. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201410174 · Cited by 1,201
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
A Graphene–Pure‐Sulfur Sandwich Structure for Ultrafast, Long‐Life Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Zhou, G., Pei, S., Li, L., Wang, D., Wang, S., Huang, K., Yin, L., Li, F., & Cheng, H. (2014) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302877 · Cited by 997
Descostes, M., Mercier, F., Thromat, N., Beaucaire, C., & Gautier-Soyer, M. (2000) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/s0169-4332(00)00443-8 · Cited by 791
Pang, Q., Tang, J., Huang, H., Liang, X., Hart, C., Tam, K. C., & Nazar, L. F. (2015) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201502467 · Cited by 780
Luo, J., Liu, J., Zeng, Z., Ng, C. F., Ma, L., Zhang, H., Lin, J., Shen, Z., & Fan, H. J. (2013) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl403461n · Cited by 773
Cited by
Advances in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Tian, H., Su, D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003666 · Cited by 870
Self-citationCurrent Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Self-citationLi, W., Guo, X., Geng, P., Du, M., Jing, Q., Chen, X., Zhang, G., Li, H., Xu, Q., Braunstein, P., et al. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202105163 · Cited by 486
Recent Advances in Hollow Porous Carbon Materials for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Fu, A., Wang, C., Pei, F., Cui, J., Fang, X., & Zheng, N. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201804786 · Cited by 417
Zhang, Z., Peng, H., Zhao, M., & Huang, J. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201707536 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- He, J., Luo, L., Chen, Y., & Manthiram, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-07-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 34
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2734813103
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 31.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Yolk–Shelled C@Fe3O4 Nanoboxes as Efficient Sulfur Hosts for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201702707
- The paper
- He, J., Luo, L., Chen, Y., & Manthiram, A. (2017). Yolk–Shelled C@Fe3O4 Nanoboxes as Efficient Sulfur Hosts for High‐Performance Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702707
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
