The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extrusion‐Based 3D Printing of Hierarchically Porous Advanced Battery Electrodes
Abstract
A highly porous 2D nanomaterial, holey graphene oxide (hGO), is synthesized directly from holey graphene powder and employed to create an aqueous 3D printable ink without the use of additives or binders. Stable dispersions of hydrophilic hGO sheets in water (≈100 mg mL−1) can be readily achieved. The shear‐thinning behavior of the aqueous hGO ink enables extrusion‐based printing of fine filaments into complex 3D architectures, such as stacked mesh structures, on arbitrary substrates. The freestanding 3D printed hGO meshes exhibit trimodal porosity: nanoscale (4–25 nm through‐holes on hGO sheets), microscale (tens of micrometer‐sized pores introduced by lyophilization), and macroscale (<500 µm square pores of the mesh design), which are advantageous for high‐performance energy storage devices that rely on interfacial reactions to promote full active‐site utilization. To elucidate the benefit of (nano)porosity and structurally conscious designs, the additive‐free architectures are demonstrated as the first 3D printed lithium–oxygen (Li–O 2) cathodes and characterized alongside 3D printed GO‐based materials without nanoporosity as well as nanoporous 2D vacuum filtrated films. The results indicate the synergistic effect between 2D nanomaterials, hierarchical porosity, and overall structural design, as well as the promise of a freeform generation of high‐energy‐density battery systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
Cited by
Shao, G., Hanaor, D. A. H., Shen, X., & Gurlo, A. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201907176 · Cited by 871
Additive Manufacturing of Batteries
Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906244 · Cited by 298
Direct ink writing of energy materials
Tagliaferri, S., Panagiotopoulos, A., & Mattevi, C. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ma00753f · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacey, S. D., Kirsch, D. J., Li, Y., Morgenstern, J. T., Zarket, B. C., Yao, Y., Dai, J., Garcia, L. Q., Liu, B., Gao, T., Xu, S., Raghavan, S. R., Connell, J. W., Lin, Y., & Hu, L.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-30
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1705651-e1705651
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2790524622
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extrusion‐Based 3D Printing of Hierarchically Porous Advanced Battery Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201705651
- The paper
- Lacey, S. D., Kirsch, D. J., Li, Y., Morgenstern, J. T., Zarket, B. C., Yao, Y., Dai, J., Garcia, L. Q., Liu, B., Gao, T., Xu, S., Raghavan, S. R., Connell, J. W., Lin, Y., & Hu, L. (2018). Extrusion‐Based 3D Printing of Hierarchically Porous Advanced Battery Electrodes. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.