Cited by 98Advanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesPolydiacetylene-based materials and applicationsGas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

A Colorimetric Artificial Olfactory System for Airborne Improvised Explosive Identification

Wang, Guangfa, Li, Yushu, Cai, Zhenzhen, Dou, Xincun·2020·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The detection of ultralow or nonvolatile target analytes remains a significant challenge for artificial olfactory systems even after decades of development, which severely limits their widespread application. To overcome this challenge, an artificial olfactory system based on a colorimetric hydrogel array is constructed for the first time as a universal representative. As an effective extension of conventional artificial olfactory systems that integrates the merits of its predecessors, the proposed system accurately mimics olfactory mucosa and specific odorant binding proteins using hydrogels endowed with specific colorimetric reagents for the detection of hypochlorite, chlorate, perchlorate, urea, and nitrate. Therefore, the proposed system is capable of detecting and discriminating between these five airborne improvised explosive microparticulates with a detection limit as low as 39.4 pg. Additionally, the system demonstrates good reusability over ten cycles, rapid response time of ≈0.2 s, and excellent discrimination properties, despite significant variation. This proof‐of‐concept study on colorimetric artificial olfactory systems yields a novel strategy for the direct and discriminative detection of nonvolatile airborne microparticulates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201907043

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The response signal of this sensor is an optical signal; different colors mark different simple explosives, and the concentration of the target gas is determined by the shade of the color.

    “However, the response signal of this sensor is an optical signal. Different colors are used to mark the different simple explosives, and then the concentration of the target gas is determined by the shade of the color.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. [250]

  • Wang et al. developed a multifunctional hydrogel detector that enables detection of a wide range of explosive substances.

    “Imitating the human olfactory system, Wang et al. [250] have developed a multifunctional hydrogel detector that enables the detection of a wide range of explosive substances (Fig. 11a-c).”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. [250]

  • The sensor is able to recognize concentrations as low as 39.4 pg with a response time of about 0.2 s.

    “The sensor is able to recognize concentrations as low as 39.4 pg with a response time of about 0.2 s.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. [250]

  • The recognition process of the response signal is complicated and requires additional processing to obtain detailed gas information such as gas concentration.

    “The recognition process of the response signal is complicated and additional processing is required to obtain detailed gas information, such as the gas concentration.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. [250]

  • The resulting hydrogel sensor was able to distinguish five different simple igniters, including hypochlorite, chlorate, perchlorate, urea and nitrate, at room temperature.

    “The resulting hydrogel sensor was able to distinguish five different simple igniters, including hypochlorite, chlorate, perchlorate, urea and nitrate, at room temperature.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Wang et al. [250]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, G., Li, Y., Cai, Z., & Dou, X.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cai, Zhenzhen
  • Dou, Xincun
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-29
Volume
32
Issue
14
Pages
e1907043-e1907043
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W3004329099
Cited by
98
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (ZDBS‐LY‐JSC029)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21904140, 51572292)
  • West Light Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2017‐XBQNXZ‐B‐002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Keywords
artificial olfactory system, colorimetric sensing, odorant-binding proteins, hypochlorite, chlorate, perchlorate, urea, nitrate, odor discrimination, sensor reusability
MeSH terms
Colorimetry, Hypochlorous Acid, Nitrates, Olfactory Mucosa, Perchlorates, Discriminant Analysis, Receptors, Odorant, Hydrogels, Biomimetics, Explosive Agents, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review