Cited by 357Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Low‐PGM and PGM‐Free Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Stability Challenges and Material Solutions

Du, Lei, Prabhakaran, Venkateshkumar, Xie, Xiaohong, Park, Sehkyu, Wang, Yong, Shao, Yuyan·2021·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Fuel cells as an attractive clean energy technology have recently regained popularity in academia, government, and industry. In a mainstream proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell, platinum-group-metal (PGM)-based catalysts account for ≈50% of the projected total cost for large-scale production. To lower the cost, two materials-based strategies have been pursued: 1) to decrease PGM catalyst usage (so-called low-PGM catalysts), and 2) to develop alternative PGM-free catalysts. Grand stability challenges exist when PGM catalyst loading is decreased in a membrane electrode assembly (MEA)-the power generation unit of a PEM fuel cell-or when PGM-free catalysts are integrated into an MEA. More importantly, there is a significant knowledge gap between materials innovation and device integration. For example, high-performance electrocatalysts usually demonstrate undesired quick degradation in MEAs. This issue significantly limits the development of PEM fuel cells. Herein, recent progress in understanding the degradation of low-PGM and PGM-free catalysts in fuel cell MEAs and materials-based solutions to address these issues are reviewed. The key factors that degrade the MEA performance are highlighted. Innovative, emerging material concepts and development of low-PGM and PGM-free catalysts are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201908232

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PGM-free catalysts degrade severely during PEM fuel cell operation, which presents the primary bottleneck for deploying PGM-free catalysts.

    “Importantly, PGM-free catalysts degrade severely during PEM fuel cell operation, which presents the primary bottleneck for deploying PGM-free catalysts [60,241].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, L., Prabhakaran, V., Xie, X., Park, S., Wang, Y., & Shao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • Du, Lei
  • Wang, Yong
  • Shao, Yuyan
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-02
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
e1908232-e1908232
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W3014509974
Cited by
357
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 14
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE‐AC05‐76RLO1830)
  • Office of Science (DE‐FG02‐05ER15712)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, PGM-free catalysts, platinum group metals, catalyst deactivation, membrane electrode assembly, electrocatalysts, catalyst stability, fuel cell cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review