The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lattice‐Strain Engineering of Homogeneous NiS0.5Se0.5 Core–Shell Nanostructure as a Highly Efficient and Robust Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting
Abstract
Developing highly‐efficient non‐noble‐metal electrocatalysts for water splitting is crucial for the development of clean and reversible hydrogen energy. Introducing lattice strain is an effective strategy to develop efficient electrocatalysts. However, lattice strain is typically co‐created with heterostructure, vacancy, or substrate effects, which complicate the identification of the strain‐activity correlation. Herein, a series of lattice‐strained homogeneous NiSxSe 1−x nanosheets@nanorods hybrids are designed and synthesized by a facile strategy. The NiS 0.5 Se 0.5 with ≈2.7% lattice strain exhibits outstanding activity for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reaction (HER/OER), affording low overpotentials of 70 and 257 mV at 10 mA cm−2, respectively, as well as excellent long‐term durability even at a large current density of 100 mA cm−2 (300 h), significantly superior to other benchmarks and the precious metal catalysts. Experimental and theoretical calculation results reveal that the generated lattice strain decreases the metal d‐orbital overlap, leading to a narrower bandwidth and a closer d‐band center toward the Fermi level. Thus, NiS 0.5 Se 0.5 possesses favorable H* adsorption kinetics for HER and lower energy barriers for OER. This work provides a new insight to regulate the lattice strain of advanced catalyst materials and further improve the performance of energy conversion technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design
Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I., Nørskov, J. K., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4998 · Cited by 12,114
Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives
Suen, N.-T., Hung, S.-F., Quan, Q., Zhang, N., Xu, Y.-J., & Chen, H. M. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00328a · Cited by 6,307
Highly Crystalline Multimetallic Nanoframes with Three-Dimensional Electrocatalytic Surfaces
Chen, C., Kang, Y., Huo, Z., Zhu, Z., Huang, W., Xin, H. L., Snyder, J. D., Li, D., Herron, J. A., Mavrikakis, M., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1249061 · Cited by 2,765
Enhanced catalytic activity in strained chemically exfoliated WS2 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution
Voiry, D., Yamaguchi, H., Li, J., Silva, R., Alves, D. C. B., Fujita, T., Chen, M., Asefa, T., Shenoy, V. B., Eda, G., et al. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3700 · Cited by 2,641
Developments and perspectives of oxide-based catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction
Fabbri, E., Habereder, A., Waltar, K., Kötz, R., & Schmidt, T. J. (2014) · Catal. Sci. Technol. · doi:10.1039/c4cy00669k · Cited by 1,303
Wang, H., Lee, H.-W., Deng, Y., Lu, Z., Hsu, P.-C., Liu, Y., Lin, D., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8261 · Cited by 1,257
Self-citationStrain-controlled electrocatalysis on multimetallic nanomaterials
Luo, M., & Guo, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.59 · Cited by 1,115
Chen, Z., Song, Y., Cai, J., Zheng, X., Han, D., Wu, Y., Zang, Y., Niu, S., Liu, Y., Zhu, J., et al. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201801834 · Cited by 1,075
Yan, H., Xie, Y., Wu, A., Cai, Z., Wang, L., Tian, C., Zhang, X., & Fu, H. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901174 · Cited by 640
Ultrathin MoS2(1–x)Se2 x Alloy Nanoflakes For Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Gong, Q., Cheng, L., Liu, C., Zhang, M., Feng, Q., Ye, H., Zeng, M., Xie, L., Liu, Z., & Li, Y. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs501970w · Cited by 535
Self-citation
Cited by
Chatenet, M., Pollet, B. G., Dekel, D. R., Dionigi, F., Deseure, J., Millet, P., Braatz, R. D., Bazant, M. Z., Eikerling, M., Staffell, I., et al. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01079k · Cited by 2,025
Rational Design of Better Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting: A Review
Liu, F., Shi, C., Guo, X., He, Z., Pan, L., Huang, Z., Zhang, X., & Zou, J. (2022) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202200307 · Cited by 455
Tip‐Enhanced Electric Field: A New Mechanism Promoting Mass Transfer in Oxygen Evolution Reactions
Liu, P., Chen, B., Liang, C., Yao, W., Cui, Y., Hu, S., Zou, P., Zhang, H., Fan, H. J., & Yang, C. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202007377 · Cited by 409
Recent progress on the long‐term stability of hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysts
Zhai, W., Ma, Y., Chen, D., Ho, J. C., Dai, Z., & Qu, Y. (2022) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12357 · Cited by 375
Lattice‐Strain Engineering for Heterogenous Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Hou, Z., Cui, C., Li, Y., Gao, Y., Zhu, D., Gu, Y., Pan, G., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202209876 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Li, X., Zhang, M., Zhou, Y., Rao, D., Zhong, C., Zhang, J., Han, X., Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Zaghib, K., Wang, Y., & Deng, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- e2000231-e2000231
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W3081910084
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lattice‐Strain Engineering of Homogeneous NiS0.5Se0.5 Core–Shell Nanostructure as a Highly Efficient and Robust Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202000231
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Li, X., Zhang, M., Zhou, Y., Rao, D., Zhong, C., Zhang, J., Han, X., Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Zaghib, K., Wang, Y., & Deng, Y. (2020). Lattice‐Strain Engineering of Homogeneous NiS0.5Se0.5 Core–Shell Nanostructure as a Highly Efficient and Robust Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202000231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
