Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High‐Rate and Selective CO2 Electrolysis to Ethylene via Metal–Organic‐Framework‐Augmented CO2 Availability

Nam, Dae‐Hyun, Shekhah, Osama, Ozden, Adnan, McCallum, Christopher, Li, Fengwang, Wang, Xue, Lum, Yanwei, Lee, Taemin, Li, Jun, Wicks, Joshua, Johnston, Andrew, Sinton, David, Eddaoudi, Mohamed, Sargent, Edward H.·2022·Advanced Materials

Abstract

High‐rate conversion of carbon dioxide (CO 2) to ethylene (C 2 H 4) in the CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR) requires fine control over the phase boundary of the gas diffusion electrode (GDE) to overcome the limit of CO 2 solubility in aqueous electrolytes. Here, a metal–organic framework (MOF)‐functionalized GDE design is presented, based on a catalysts:MOFs:hydrophobic substrate materials layered architecture, that leads to high‐rate and selective C 2 H 4 production in flow cells and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) electrolyzers. It is found that using electroanalysis and operando X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), MOF‐induced organic layers in GDEs augment the local CO 2 concentration near the active sites of the Cu catalysts. MOFs with different CO 2 adsorption abilities are used, and the stacking ordering of MOFs in the GDE is varied. While sputtering Cu on poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (Cu/PTFE) exhibits 43% C 2 H 4 Faradaic efficiency (FE) at a current density of 200 mA cm−2 in a flow cell, 49% C 2 H 4 FE at 1 A cm−2 is achieved on MOF‐augmented GDEs in CO 2 RR. MOF‐augmented GDEs are further evaluated in an MEA electrolyzer, achieving a C 2 H 4 partial current density of 220 mA cm−2 for CO 2 RR and 121 mA cm−2 for the carbon monoxide reduction reaction (CORR), representing 2.7‐fold and 15‐fold improvement in C 2 H 4 production rate, compared to those obtained on bare Cu/PTFE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202207088

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 172

Metadata

Authors
Nam, D., Shekhah, O., Ozden, A., McCallum, C., Li, F., Wang, X., Lum, Y., Lee, T., Li, J., Wicks, J., Johnston, A., Sinton, D., Eddaoudi, M., & Sargent, E. H.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-16
Volume
34
Issue
51
Pages
e2207088-e2207088
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4306391014
Cited by
172
References
7
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Rate and Selective CO2 Electrolysis to Ethylene via Metal–Organic‐Framework‐Augmented CO2 Availability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202207088
The paper
Nam, D., Shekhah, O., Ozden, A., McCallum, C., Li, F., Wang, X., Lum, Y., Lee, T., Li, J., Wicks, J., Johnston, A., Sinton, D., Eddaoudi, M., & Sargent, E. H. (2022). High‐Rate and Selective CO2 Electrolysis to Ethylene via Metal–Organic‐Framework‐Augmented CO2 Availability. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202207088

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.