Cited by 194Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Recent progress in low Pt content electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction

Li, Zheng, Ge, Ruixiang, Su, Jianwei, Chen, Liang·2020·Advanced Materials Interfaces

Abstract

Electrochemical water splitting plays a key role in the production of highly pure hydrogen by using renewable energy. To lower energy consumption, efficient electrocatalysts are required to drive and accelerate hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Although Pt is still considered as a state‐of‐the‐art electrocatalyst toward HER, its large‐scale deployment is limited by the scarcity and high price. Low Pt content electrocatalysts (LPCEs) have great potential to overcome this limitation by lowering Pt consumption, while its high activity can be maintained in the meantime. In this review, some major synthetic methods of LPCEs are summarized, including wet‐chemistry method, electrochemistry method, annealing, and atomic layer deposition. Subsequently, the authors review a series of electrocatalysts of LPCEs toward HER in recent years. Based on the classification of different Pt forms, such LPCEs include Pt nanoparticles on supports, Pt nanoclusters on supports, Pt single‐atom catalysts (SACs), Pt alloy catalysts, and LCEPs with Pt‐rich surfaces. Notably, the HER performance can be improved by engineering LPCEs by using several strategies. Finally, the authors discuss the achievements and perspectives for LPCEs, which might provide some insights for future industrialized applications in hydrogen production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/admi.202000396

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Ge, R., Su, J., & Chen, L.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Su, Jianwei
  • Chen, Liang
Venue
Advanced Materials Interfaces
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-05-17
Volume
7
Issue
14
ISSN
2196-7350 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026566923
Cited by
194
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS‐LY‐JSC021)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872306)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ19B030002)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo (2018A610016)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, electrochemical water splitting, platinum single-atom catalysts, Pt nanoclusters, platinum nanoparticles, catalyst synthesis methods, atomic layer deposition, hydrogen production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review