The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catalytic Effects in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Promoted Sulfur Transformation and Reduced Shuttle Effect
Open accessAbstract
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery has emerged as one of the most promising next‐generation energy‐storage systems. However, the shuttle effect greatly reduces the battery cycle life and sulfur utilization, which is great deterrent to its practical use. This paper reviews the tremendous efforts that are made to find a remedy for this problem, mostly through physical or chemical confinement of the lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). Intrinsically, this “confinement” has a relatively limited effect on improving the battery performance because in most cases, the LiPSs are “passively” blocked and cannot be reused. Thus, this strategy becomes less effective with a high sulfur loading and ultralong cycling. A more “positive” method that not only traps but also increases the subsequent conversion of LiPSs back to lithium sulfides is urgently needed to fundamentally solve the shuttle effect. Here, recent advances on catalytic effects in increasing the rate of conversion of soluble long‐chain LiPSs to insoluble short‐chain Li 2 S 2/Li 2 S, and vice versa, are reviewed, and the roles of noble metals, metal oxides, metal sulfides, metal nitrides, and some metal‐free materials in this process are highlighted. Challenges and potential solutions for the design of catalytic cathodes and interlayers in Li–S battery are discussed in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Performance Electrocatalysis Using Metallic Cobalt Pyrite (CoS2) Micro- and Nanostructures
Faber, M. S., Dziedzic, R., Lukowski, M. A., Kaiser, N. S., Ding, Q., & Jin, S. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja504099w · Cited by 1,372
Cited by
Ng, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Ye, Z., Jiang, Y., Li, L., Wu, F., & Chen, R. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202002168 · Cited by 394
Progress and Perspective of Solid‐State Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Lei, D., Shi, K., Ye, H., Wan, Z., Wang, Y., Shen, L., Li, B., Yang, Q., Kang, F., & He, Y. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201707570 · Cited by 282
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, D., Zhang, C., Zhou, G., Lv, W., Ling, G., Zhi, L., & Yang, Q.
- Venue
- Advanced Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-09-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1700270-1700270
- ISSN
- 2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753050978
- Cited by
- 956
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catalytic Effects in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Promoted Sulfur Transformation and Reduced Shuttle Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/advs.201700270
- The paper
- Liu, D., Zhang, C., Zhou, G., Lv, W., Ling, G., Zhi, L., & Yang, Q. (2018). Catalytic Effects in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: Promoted Sulfur Transformation and Reduced Shuttle Effect. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700270
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.