Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 674

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 149 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommended Methods to Study Resistive Switching Devices

Open access
Lanza, Mario, Wong, H.‐S. Philip, Pop, Eric, Ielmini, Daniele, Strukov, Dimitri, Regan, Brian C., Larcher, Luca, Villena, Marco A., Yang, J. Joshua, Goux, Ludovic, Belmonte, Attilio, Yang, Yuchao, Puglisi, Francesco M., Kang, Jinfeng, Magyari‐Köpe, Blanka, Yalon, Eilam, Kenyon, Anthony, Buckwell, Mark, Mehonic, Adnan, Shluger, Alexander, Li, Haitong, Hou, Tuo‐Hung, Hudec, Boris, Akinwande, Deji, Ge, Ruijing, Ambrogio, Stefano, Roldan, Juan B., Miranda, Enrique, Suñe, Jordi, Pey, Kin Leong, Wu, Xing, Raghavan, Nagarajan, Wu, Ernest, Lu, Wei D., Navarro, Gabriele, Zhang, Weidong, Wu, Huaqiang, Li, Runwei, Holleitner, Alexander, Wurstbauer, Ursula, Lemme, Max C., Liu, Ming, Long, Shibing, Liu, Qi, Lv, Hangbing, Padovani, Andrea, Pavan, Paolo, Valov, Ilia, Jing, Xu, Han, Tingting, Zhu, Kaichen, Chen, Shaochuan, Hui, Fei, Shi, Yuanyuan·2019·Advanced Electronic Materials

Abstract

Resistive switching (RS) is an interesting property shown by some materials systems that, especially during the last decade, has gained a lot of interest for the fabrication of electronic devices, with electronic nonvolatile memories being those that have received the most attention. The presence and quality of the RS phenomenon in a materials system can be studied using different prototype cells, performing different experiments, displaying different figures of merit, and developing different computational analyses. Therefore, the real usefulness and impact of the findings presented in each study for the RS technology will be also different. This manuscript describes the most recommendable methodologies for the fabrication, characterization, and simulation of RS devices, as well as the proper methods to display the data obtained. The idea is to help the scientific community to evaluate the real usefulness and impact of an RS study for the development of RS technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aelm.201800143

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 149 references

Cited by

See all 674

Metadata

Authors
Lanza, M., Wong, H. ‐. P., Pop, E., Ielmini, D., Strukov, D., Regan, B. C., Larcher, L., Villena, M. A., Yang, J. J., Goux, L., Belmonte, A., Yang, Y., Puglisi, F. M., Kang, J., Magyari‐Köpe, B., Yalon, E., Kenyon, A., Buckwell, M., Mehonic, A., Shluger, A., Li, H., Hou, T., Hudec, B., Akinwande, D., Ge, R., Ambrogio, S., Roldan, J. B., Miranda, E., Suñe, J., Pey, K. L., Wu, X., Raghavan, N., Wu, E., Lu, W. D., Navarro, G., Zhang, W., Wu, H., Li, R., Holleitner, A., Wurstbauer, U., Lemme, M. C., Liu, M., Long, S., Liu, Q., Lv, H., Padovani, A., Pavan, P., Valov, I., Jing, X., Han, T., Zhu, K., Chen, S., Hui, F., & Shi, Y.
Venue
Advanced Electronic Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-27
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2199-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2894173111
Cited by
674
References
149
FWCI
25.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommended Methods to Study Resistive Switching Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aelm.201800143
The paper
Lanza, M., Wong, H. ‐. P., Pop, E., Ielmini, D., Strukov, D., Regan, B. C., Larcher, L., Villena, M. A., Yang, J. J., Goux, L., Belmonte, A., Yang, Y., Puglisi, F. M., Kang, J., Magyari‐Köpe, B., Yalon, E., Kenyon, A., Buckwell, M., Mehonic, A., . . . Shi, Y. (2019). Recommended Methods to Study Resistive Switching Devices. Advanced Electronic Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201800143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.