The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries with a Self‐Supported, 3D Li2S‐Doped Graphene Aerogel Cathodes
Abstract
Lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries are being considered as the next‐generation high‐energy‐storage system due to their high theoretical energy density. However, the use of a lithium‐metal anode poses serious safety concerns due to lithium dendrite formation, which causes short‐circuiting, and possible explosions of the cell. One feasible way to address this issue is to pair a fully lithiated lithium sulfide (Li 2 S) cathode with lithium metal‐free anodes. However, bulk Li 2 S particles face the challenges of having a large activation barrier during the initial charge, low active‐material utilization, poor electrical conductivity, and fast capacity fade, preventing their practical utility. Here, the development of a self‐supported, high capacity, long‐life cathode material is presented for Li‐S batteries by coating Li 2 S onto doped graphene aerogels via a simple liquid infiltration–evaporation coating method. The resultant cathodes are able to lower the initial charge voltage barrier and attain a high specific capacity, good rate capability, and excellent cycling stability. The improved performance can be attributed to the (i) cross‐linked, porous graphene network enabling fast electron/ion transfer, (ii) coated Li 2 S on graphene with high utilization and a reduced energy barrier, and (iii) doped heteroatoms with a strong binding affinity toward Li 2 S/lithium polysulfides with reduced polysulfide dissolution based on first‐principles calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Recent advances in shuttle effect inhibition for lithium sulfur batteries
Ren, W., Ma, W., Zhang, S., & Tang, B. (2019) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.02.022 · Cited by 434
Zhong, Y., Chao, D., Deng, S., Zhan, J., Fang, R., Xia, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Xia, X., & Tu, J. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201706391 · Cited by 428
Chen, T., Ma, L., Cheng, B., Chen, R., Hu, Y., Zhu, G., Wang, Y., Liang, J., Tie, Z., Liu, J., et al. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.064 · Cited by 334
He, J., Chen, Y., Lv, W., Wen, K., Xu, C., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Qin, W., & He, W. (2016) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b05696 · Cited by 305
Nanostructured positive electrode materials for post-lithium ion batteries
Wang, F., Wu, X., Li, C., Zhu, Y., Fu, L., Wu, Y., & Liu, X. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c6ee02070d · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, G., Paek, E., Hwang, G. S., & Manthiram, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-16
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2200133427
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries with a Self‐Supported, 3D Li2S‐Doped Graphene Aerogel Cathodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201501355
- The paper
- Zhou, G., Paek, E., Hwang, G. S., & Manthiram, A. (2016). High‐Performance Lithium‐Sulfur Batteries with a Self‐Supported, 3D Li2S‐Doped Graphene Aerogel Cathodes. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501355
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.