The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery
Abstract
Safety, nontoxicity, and durability directly determine the applicability of the essential characteristics of the lithium (Li)‐ion battery. Particularly, for the lithium–sulfur battery, due to the low ignition temperature of sulfur, metal lithium as the anode material, and the use of flammable organic electrolytes, addressing security problems is of increased difficulty. In the past few years, two basic electrolyte systems are studied extensively to solve the notorious safety issues. One system is the conventional organic liquid electrolyte, and the other is the inorganic solid‐state or quasi‐solid‐state composite electrolyte. Here, the recent development of engineered liquid electrolytes and design considerations for solid electrolytes in tackling these safety issues are reviewed to ensure the safety of electrolyte systems between sulfur cathode materials and the lithium‐metal anode. Specifically, strategies for designing and modifying liquid electrolytes including introducing gas evolution, flame, aqueous, and dendrite‐free electrolytes are proposed. Moreover, the considerations involving a high‐performance Li+ conductor, air‐stable Li+ conductors, and stable interface performance between the sulfur cathode and the lithium anode for developing all‐solid‐state electrolytes are discussed. In the end, an outlook for future directions to offer reliable electrolyte systems is presented for the development of commercially viable lithium–sulfur batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway
Finegan, D. P., Scheel, M., Robinson, J. B., Tjaden, B., Hunt, I., Mason, T. J., Millichamp, J., Di Michiel, M., Offer, G. J., Hinds, G., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7924 · Cited by 844
Cited by
High‐Energy Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Recent Progress and a Promising Future in Applications
Xu, J., Cai, X., Cai, S., Shao, Y., Hu, C., Lu, S., & Ding, S. (2023) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12450 · Cited by 1,201
Advances in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries: From Academic Research to Commercial Viability
Chen, Y., Wang, T., Tian, H., Su, D., Zhang, Q., & Wang, G. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202003666 · Cited by 870
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Emerging Catalysts to Promote Kinetics of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Wang, P., Xi, B., Huang, M., Chen, W., Feng, J., & Xiong, S. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202002893 · Cited by 451
Self-citationNg, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, W., Lei, T., Wu, C., Deng, M., Gong, C., Hu, K., Ma, Y., Dai, L., Lv, W., He, W., Liu, X., Xiong, J., & Yan, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-17
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 10
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2793740354
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201702348
- The paper
- Chen, W., Lei, T., Wu, C., Deng, M., Gong, C., Hu, K., Ma, Y., Dai, L., Lv, W., He, W., Liu, X., Xiong, J., & Yan, C. (2018). Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.