Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery

Chen, Wei, Lei, Tianyu, Wu, Chunyang, Deng, Min, Gong, Chuanhui, Hu, Kai, Ma, Yinchang, Dai, Liping, Lv, Weiqiang, He, Weidong, Liu, Xuejun, Xiong, Jie, Yan, Chenglin·2018·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Safety, nontoxicity, and durability directly determine the applicability of the essential characteristics of the lithium (Li)‐ion battery. Particularly, for the lithium–sulfur battery, due to the low ignition temperature of sulfur, metal lithium as the anode material, and the use of flammable organic electrolytes, addressing security problems is of increased difficulty. In the past few years, two basic electrolyte systems are studied extensively to solve the notorious safety issues. One system is the conventional organic liquid electrolyte, and the other is the inorganic solid‐state or quasi‐solid‐state composite electrolyte. Here, the recent development of engineered liquid electrolytes and design considerations for solid electrolytes in tackling these safety issues are reviewed to ensure the safety of electrolyte systems between sulfur cathode materials and the lithium‐metal anode. Specifically, strategies for designing and modifying liquid electrolytes including introducing gas evolution, flame, aqueous, and dendrite‐free electrolytes are proposed. Moreover, the considerations involving a high‐performance Li+ conductor, air‐stable Li+ conductors, and stable interface performance between the sulfur cathode and the lithium anode for developing all‐solid‐state electrolytes are discussed. In the end, an outlook for future directions to offer reliable electrolyte systems is presented for the development of commercially viable lithium–sulfur batteries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201702348

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Chen, W., Lei, T., Wu, C., Deng, M., Gong, C., Hu, K., Ma, Y., Dai, L., Lv, W., He, W., Liu, X., Xiong, J., & Yan, C.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-17
Volume
8
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2793740354
Cited by
356
References
3
FWCI
19.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201702348
The paper
Chen, W., Lei, T., Wu, C., Deng, M., Gong, C., Hu, K., Ma, Y., Dai, L., Lv, W., He, W., Liu, X., Xiong, J., & Yan, C. (2018). Designing Safe Electrolyte Systems for a High‐Stability Lithium–Sulfur Battery. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702348

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.