Cited by 26Pasture and Agricultural SystemsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop Yield

Improvements in soil properties under adaptive multipaddock grazing relative to conventional grazing

Open access
Mosier, Samantha, Apfelbaum, Steve, Byck, Peter, Ippolito, Jim, Cotrufo, M. Francesca·2022·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Within managed ecosystems, such as some livestock grazed grasslands, soil physical, chemical, and biological properties may be severely compromised relative to native grasslands. Conventional grazing (CG) management, commonly referred to as continuous grazing, can affect soil properties and health by reducing soil C stocks and other available nutrients, while creating bare patches in vegetation that may enhance erosion and runoff. In contrast, adaptive multipaddock (AMP) grazing, an intensive form of rotational grazing that moves dense cattle herds quickly over the land followed by rest periods for the regrowth of plants, has been proposed as a regenerative grassland management tool that can improve soil properties such as soil C stocks, soil structure, as well as nutrient and water retention. Our research analyzed soils from 10 grasslands in the southeast United States representing either CG or AMP grazing management. We analyzed the A‐horizons of these soils for physical, chemical, and biological properties considered indicators of soil health across each management type. Chemical soil properties (e.g., cation exchange capacity [CEC], base saturation [BS], electrical conductivity [EC]) were improved where AMP grazing management was implemented. Additionally, farms using AMP grazing management had greater A‐horizon C and N stocks in bulk soils and across multiple soil organic matter (SOM) fractions. No biological indicators measured were affected by the grassland management except potential N mineralization rate, which was lower under AMP. Taken together, these results provide evidence that AMP grazing management could be implemented to regenerate several grassland soil properties across land currently under conventional grazing management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/agj2.21135

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Averill, C., & Waring, C. (2018). Nitrogen limitation of decomposition and decay: How can it occur? Global Change Biology, 24, 1417-1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13980 · DOI
  2. Bailey, D. W., Dumont, B., & Wallisdevries, M. F. (1998). Utilization of heterogeneous grasslands by domestic herbivores: Theory to manage- ment. Annales de Zootechnie, 47, 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1051/ animres:19980501 · DOI
  3. Baligar, V. C., Fageria, F. K., & He, Z. L. (2001). Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 921-950. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104098 · DOI
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beery, M., & Wilding, L. P. (1971). The relationship between soil pH and base saturation percentage for surface and subsoil horizons of selected Mollisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols in Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 71, 43-55.
  6. Bell, C. W., Fricks, B. E., Rocca, J. D., Steinweg, J. M., McMahon, S. K., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2013). High-throughput fluorometric mea- surement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 81, e50961.
  7. Bolan, N. S., Arulmozhiselvan, K., & Paramasivam, P. (2002). Mag- nesium. In R. Lal (Ed.) Encyclopedia of soil science (3rd ed., pp. 1392-1395). CRC Press.
  8. Bundy, L. G., & Meisinger, J. J. (1994). Nitrogen availability indices. In R. W. Weaver (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties, 5.2 (pp. 951-984). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c41 · DOI
  9. Byrnes, R. C., Eastburn, D. J., Tate, K. W., & Roche, L. M. (2018). A global meta-analysis of grazing impacts on soil health indicators. Journal of Environmental Quality, 47, 758-765. https://doi.org/10. 2134/jeq2017.08.0313 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Conant, R. T., & Paustian, K. (2002). Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 1143. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001661 · DOI
  11. Conant, R. T., Paustian, K., & Elliot, E. T. (2001). Grassland manage- ment and conversion into grassland: Effects on soil carbon. Ecological Applications, 11, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001) 0110343:GMACIG2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  12. Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. A. (2013). The microbial efficiency-matrix stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic mat- ter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable organic matter? Global Change Biology, 19, 988-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb. 12113 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Denef, K., Bubenheim, H., Lenhart, K., Vermeulen, J., Van Cleemput, O., Boeckx, P., & Muller, C. (2007). Community shifts and carbon translocation within metabolically-active rhizosphere microorgan- isms in grasslands under elevated CO2. Biogeosciences, 4, 769-779. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-769-2007 · DOI
  14. Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In J. W. Doran, D. C. Coleman, D. F. Bzedicek, & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment (Volume 35, pp. 3-22). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub35. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle-size analysis. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods, 5.1 (2nd ed., pp. 383-411). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 · DOI
  16. Gomez, J. D., Denef, K., Stewart, C. E., Zheng, J., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2014). Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 65, 28- 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12097 · DOI
  17. Jian, J., Du, X., & Stewart, R. D. (2020). A database for global soil health assessment. Scientific Data, 7, 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597- 020-0356-3 · DOI
  18. Keen, B. A., & Rackowski, H. (1921). The relation between the clay con- tent of certain physical properties of a soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11, 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600004469 · DOI
  19. Kemper, W. D., & Roseneau, R. C. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 phys- ical and mineralogical methods, 5.1 (2nd ed., pp. 425-442), SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c17 · DOI
  20. Kibblewhite, M. G., Ritz, K., & Swift, M. J. (2008). Soil health in agri- culture systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2178 · DOI
  21. Klute, A. (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods, 5.1 (2nd ed., pp. 635-662), SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssabookser5.1.2ed.c26 · DOI
  22. Koyama, A., Wallenstein, M. D., Simpson, R. T., & Moore, J. C. (2013). Carbon-degrading enzyme activities stimulated by increased nutrient availability in Arctic tundra soils. PLOS ONE, 8, e77212. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077212 · DOI
  23. Larson, W. E., & Pierce, F. J. (1991). Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. In J. Dumanski (Ed.), Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world: Proceedings of the Interna- tional Workshop on Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 15-21 September 1991 (pp. 175-203). International Board for Soil Research Management.
  24. Lavallee, J. M., Soon, J. L., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2020). Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Global Change Biology, 26, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Lindsay, W. L. (1972). Zinc in soils and plant nutrition. Advances in Agronomy, 24, 147-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08) 60635-5 · DOI
  26. Lynch, L. M., Machmuller, M. B., Cotrufo, M. F., Paul, E. A., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2018). Tracking the fate of fresh carbon in the Arctic tundra: Will shrub expansion alter responses of soil organic matter to warming? Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 120, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.002 · DOI
  27. Machmuller, M. B., Kramer, M. G., Cyle, T. K., Hill, N., Hancock, D., & Thompson, A. (2014). Emerging land use practices rapidly increase soil organic matter. Nature Communications, 6, 6995. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms7995 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Milchunas, D. G., & Lauenroth, W. K. (1993). Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of envi- ronments. Ecological Monographs, 63, 327-366. https://doi.org/10. 2307/2937150 · DOI
  29. Moebius-Clune, B. N., Moebius-Clune, D. J., Gugino, B. K., Idowu, O. J., Schindelbeck, R. R., Ristow, A. J., van Es, H. M., Thies, J. E., Shayler, H. A., McBride, M. B., Kurtz, K. S. M., Wolfe, D. W., & Abawi, G. S. (2016). Comprehensive assessment of soil health-The Cornell framework (3.2 ed.). Cornell University.
  30. Mosier, S., Apfelbaum, S., Byck, P., Calderon, F., Teague, R., Thompson, R., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2021). Adaptive multi-paddock grazing enhances soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and stabilization through mineral association in southeastern U.S. grazing lands. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, 112409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2021.112409 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Mosier, S., Paustian, K., Davies, C., Kane, M., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2019). Soil organic matter pools under management intensification of loblolly pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 447, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.056 · DOI
  32. Norris, C. E., Mac Bean, G., Cappellazzi, S. B., Cope, M., Greub, K. L. H., Liptzin, D., Rieke, E. L., Tracy, P. W., Morgan, C. L. S., & Honeycutt, C. W. (2020). Introducing the North American project to evaluate soil health measurements. Agronomy, 112, 3195-3215. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20234 · DOI
  33. Rengel, Z. (2002). Calcium. In R. Lal (Ed.) Encyclopedia of soil science (3rd ed., pp. 267-269). CRC Press.
  34. Rhoades, J. D. (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dis- solved solids. In D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, M. A. Tabatabai, C. T. Johnston, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods, 5.3 (pp. 417-435). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14 · DOI
  35. Rocci, K. S., Lavallee, J. M., Stewart, C. E., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2021). Soil organic carbon response to global environmental change depends on its distribution between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 793, 148569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148569 · DOI
  36. Shewmaker, G. E., & Bohle, M. G. (Eds.). (2010). Pasture and graz- ing management in the northwest (Pacific Northwest Extension Publication No. PNW 214). University of Idaho Extension.
  37. Sherrod, L. A., Gunn, G., Peterson, G. A., & Kolberg, R. L. (2002). Inor- ganic carbon analysis by modified pressure-calicmeter method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 299-305. https://doi.org/10. 2136/sssaj2002.2990 · DOI
  38. Sikora, F. S., & Moore, K. P. (2014). Soil test methods from the southeastern United States. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin, 419.
  39. Smith, J. L., & Doran, J. W. (1996). Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In J. W. Doran & A. J. Jones (Eds.), Methods for assessing soil quality, volume 49 (pp. 169-185). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c10 · DOI
  40. Steffens, M., Kolbl, A., Totsche, K. U., & Kogel-Knabner, I. (2008). Grazing effects on soil chemical and physical properties in a semi- arid steppe of Inner Mongolia (P.R. China). Geoderma, 143, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.09.004 · DOI
  41. Stott, D. E., & Moebius-Clune, B. N. (2017). Soil health: Challenges and opportunities. In D. J. Field, C. L. S. Morgan, & A. B. McBratney (Eds.) Global soil security (pp. 109-121). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_10 · DOI
  42. Teague, W. R. (2018). Forages and pastures symposium: Cover crops in livestock production: Whole-system approach: Cover crops in livestock production: Whole-system approach: Managing grazing to restore soil health and farm livelihoods. Journal of Animal Science, 4, 1519-1530. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx060 · DOI
  43. Teague, W. R., Apfelbaum, S., Lal, R., Kreuter, U. P., Rowntree, J., Davies, C. A., Conser, R., Rasmussen, M., Hatfield, J., Want, T., & Byck, P. (2016). The role of ruminants in reducing agricul- ture's carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.2.156 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Teague, W. R., Dowhower, S. L., Baker, S. A., Haile, N., DeLaune, P. B., & Conover, D. M. (2011). Grazing management impacts on vegeta- tion, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 141, 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Teague, W. R., Dowhower, S. L., & Waggoner, J. A. (2004). Drought and grazing patch dynamics under different grazing management. Journal of Arid Environments, 58, 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 1963(03)00122-8 · DOI
  46. Teague, W. R., Provenza, F., Kreuter, U., Steffens, T., & Barnes, M. (2013). Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: Why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience. Jour- nal of Environmental Management, 128, 699-717. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Thomas, G. W. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. In D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, M. A. Tabatabai, C. T. Johnston, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods, 5.3 (pp. 475-490). SSSA. https:// doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16 · DOI
  48. Wallenstein, M. D., Haddix, M. L., Lee, D. D., Conant, R. T., & Paul, E. A. (2012). A litter-slurry technique elucidates the key role of enzyme production and microbial dynamics in temperature sensitiv- ity of organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 47, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.009 · DOI
  49. Wallenstein, M. D., McMahon, S. K., & Schimel, J. P. (2009). Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Global Change Biology, 15, 1631-1639. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01819.x · DOI
  50. Waring, S. A., & Bremner, J. M. (1964). Ammonium produc- tion in soil under waterlogged conditions as an index of nitro- gen availability. Nature, 201, 951-952. https://doi.org/10.1038/2019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mosier, S., Apfelbaum, S., Byck, P., Ippolito, J., & Cotrufo, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Applied BioPhysics (United States) (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins CO USA
Corresponding author
Mosier, Samantha
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-07
Volume
114
Issue
4
Pages
2584-2597
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W4281625706
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
rotational grazing, soil health, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, cation exchange capacity, base saturation, soil structure, soil nutrient retention, nitrogen mineralization, cattle grazing, soil organic matter fractions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review