Improvements in soil properties under adaptive multipaddock grazing relative to conventional grazing
Open accessAbstract
Within managed ecosystems, such as some livestock grazed grasslands, soil physical, chemical, and biological properties may be severely compromised relative to native grasslands. Conventional grazing (CG) management, commonly referred to as continuous grazing, can affect soil properties and health by reducing soil C stocks and other available nutrients, while creating bare patches in vegetation that may enhance erosion and runoff. In contrast, adaptive multipaddock (AMP) grazing, an intensive form of rotational grazing that moves dense cattle herds quickly over the land followed by rest periods for the regrowth of plants, has been proposed as a regenerative grassland management tool that can improve soil properties such as soil C stocks, soil structure, as well as nutrient and water retention. Our research analyzed soils from 10 grasslands in the southeast United States representing either CG or AMP grazing management. We analyzed the A‐horizons of these soils for physical, chemical, and biological properties considered indicators of soil health across each management type. Chemical soil properties (e.g., cation exchange capacity [CEC], base saturation [BS], electrical conductivity [EC]) were improved where AMP grazing management was implemented. Additionally, farms using AMP grazing management had greater A‐horizon C and N stocks in bulk soils and across multiple soil organic matter (SOM) fractions. No biological indicators measured were affected by the grassland management except potential N mineralization rate, which was lower under AMP. Taken together, these results provide evidence that AMP grazing management could be implemented to regenerate several grassland soil properties across land currently under conventional grazing management.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some studies compared SOC between AMP and conventional grazing at one timepoint and therefore could not report accrual rates.
“Additionally, some studies compared SOC between AMP and conventional grazing at one timepoint (Mosier et al., 2022;Stanley et al., 2025) and therefore could not report accrual rates.”
From Impact of 10 years of adaptive multi-paddock grazing on soil carbon and beef's greenhouse gas footprint in the US Upper Midwest (2026) · cites this paper as Mosier et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Formation of soil organic matter via biochemical and physical pathways of litter mass loss
Cotrufo, M. F., Soong, J. L., Horton, A. J., Campbell, E. E., Haddix, M. L., Wall, D. H., & Parton, W. J. (2015) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/ngeo2520 · Cited by 1,874 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1945 · Cited by 1,341 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 50
- Averill, C., & Waring, C. (2018). Nitrogen limitation of decomposition and decay: How can it occur? Global Change Biology, 24, 1417-1427. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13980 · DOI
- Bailey, D. W., Dumont, B., & Wallisdevries, M. F. (1998). Utilization of heterogeneous grasslands by domestic herbivores: Theory to manage- ment. Annales de Zootechnie, 47, 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1051/ animres:19980501 · DOI
- Baligar, V. C., Fageria, F. K., & He, Z. L. (2001). Nutrient use efficiency in plants. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 921-950. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104098 · DOI
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
- Beery, M., & Wilding, L. P. (1971). The relationship between soil pH and base saturation percentage for surface and subsoil horizons of selected Mollisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols in Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science, 71, 43-55.
- Bell, C. W., Fricks, B. E., Rocca, J. D., Steinweg, J. M., McMahon, S. K., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2013). High-throughput fluorometric mea- surement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 81, e50961.
- Bolan, N. S., Arulmozhiselvan, K., & Paramasivam, P. (2002). Mag- nesium. In R. Lal (Ed.) Encyclopedia of soil science (3rd ed., pp. 1392-1395). CRC Press.
- Bundy, L. G., & Meisinger, J. J. (1994). Nitrogen availability indices. In R. W. Weaver (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 microbiological and biochemical properties, 5.2 (pp. 951-984). Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c41 · DOI
- Byrnes, R. C., Eastburn, D. J., Tate, K. W., & Roche, L. M. (2018). A global meta-analysis of grazing impacts on soil health indicators. Journal of Environmental Quality, 47, 758-765. https://doi.org/10. 2134/jeq2017.08.0313 · DOI · Paper page
- Conant, R. T., & Paustian, K. (2002). Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 16, 1143. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001661 · DOI
- Conant, R. T., Paustian, K., & Elliot, E. T. (2001). Grassland manage- ment and conversion into grassland: Effects on soil carbon. Ecological Applications, 11, 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001) 0110343:GMACIG2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K., & Paul, E. A. (2013). The microbial efficiency-matrix stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic mat- ter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form stable organic matter? Global Change Biology, 19, 988-995. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb. 12113 · DOI · Paper page
- Denef, K., Bubenheim, H., Lenhart, K., Vermeulen, J., Van Cleemput, O., Boeckx, P., & Muller, C. (2007). Community shifts and carbon translocation within metabolically-active rhizosphere microorgan- isms in grasslands under elevated CO2. Biogeosciences, 4, 769-779. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-769-2007 · DOI
- Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In J. W. Doran, D. C. Coleman, D. F. Bzedicek, & B. A. Stewart (Eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment (Volume 35, pp. 3-22). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub35. · DOI · Paper page
- Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Particle-size analysis. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods, 5.1 (2nd ed., pp. 383-411). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssabookser5.1.2ed.c15 · DOI
- Gomez, J. D., Denef, K., Stewart, C. E., Zheng, J., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2014). Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. European Journal of Soil Science, 65, 28- 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12097 · DOI
- Jian, J., Du, X., & Stewart, R. D. (2020). A database for global soil health assessment. Scientific Data, 7, 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597- 020-0356-3 · DOI
- Keen, B. A., & Rackowski, H. (1921). The relation between the clay con- tent of certain physical properties of a soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11, 441-449. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600004469 · DOI
- Kemper, W. D., & Roseneau, R. C. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 phys- ical and mineralogical methods, 5.1 (2nd ed., pp. 425-442), SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c17 · DOI
- Kibblewhite, M. G., Ritz, K., & Swift, M. J. (2008). Soil health in agri- culture systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 363, 685-701. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2178 · DOI
- Klute, A. (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1 physical and mineralogical methods, 5.1 (2nd ed., pp. 635-662), SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/ sssabookser5.1.2ed.c26 · DOI
- Koyama, A., Wallenstein, M. D., Simpson, R. T., & Moore, J. C. (2013). Carbon-degrading enzyme activities stimulated by increased nutrient availability in Arctic tundra soils. PLOS ONE, 8, e77212. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077212 · DOI
- Larson, W. E., & Pierce, F. J. (1991). Conservation and enhancement of soil quality. In J. Dumanski (Ed.), Evaluation for sustainable land management in the developing world: Proceedings of the Interna- tional Workshop on Evaluation for Sustainable Land Management in the Developing World, Chiang Rai, Thailand, 15-21 September 1991 (pp. 175-203). International Board for Soil Research Management.
- Lavallee, J. M., Soon, J. L., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2020). Conceptualizing soil organic matter into particulate and mineral-associated forms to address global change in the 21st century. Global Change Biology, 26, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14859 · DOI · Paper page
- Lindsay, W. L. (1972). Zinc in soils and plant nutrition. Advances in Agronomy, 24, 147-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08) 60635-5 · DOI
- Lynch, L. M., Machmuller, M. B., Cotrufo, M. F., Paul, E. A., & Wallenstein, M. D. (2018). Tracking the fate of fresh carbon in the Arctic tundra: Will shrub expansion alter responses of soil organic matter to warming? Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 120, 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.02.002 · DOI
- Machmuller, M. B., Kramer, M. G., Cyle, T. K., Hill, N., Hancock, D., & Thompson, A. (2014). Emerging land use practices rapidly increase soil organic matter. Nature Communications, 6, 6995. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms7995 · DOI · Paper page
- Milchunas, D. G., & Lauenroth, W. K. (1993). Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of envi- ronments. Ecological Monographs, 63, 327-366. https://doi.org/10. 2307/2937150 · DOI
- Moebius-Clune, B. N., Moebius-Clune, D. J., Gugino, B. K., Idowu, O. J., Schindelbeck, R. R., Ristow, A. J., van Es, H. M., Thies, J. E., Shayler, H. A., McBride, M. B., Kurtz, K. S. M., Wolfe, D. W., & Abawi, G. S. (2016). Comprehensive assessment of soil health-The Cornell framework (3.2 ed.). Cornell University.
- Mosier, S., Apfelbaum, S., Byck, P., Calderon, F., Teague, R., Thompson, R., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2021). Adaptive multi-paddock grazing enhances soil carbon and nitrogen stocks and stabilization through mineral association in southeastern U.S. grazing lands. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, 112409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2021.112409 · DOI · Paper page
- Mosier, S., Paustian, K., Davies, C., Kane, M., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2019). Soil organic matter pools under management intensification of loblolly pine plantations. Forest Ecology and Management, 447, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.05.056 · DOI
- Norris, C. E., Mac Bean, G., Cappellazzi, S. B., Cope, M., Greub, K. L. H., Liptzin, D., Rieke, E. L., Tracy, P. W., Morgan, C. L. S., & Honeycutt, C. W. (2020). Introducing the North American project to evaluate soil health measurements. Agronomy, 112, 3195-3215. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20234 · DOI
- Rengel, Z. (2002). Calcium. In R. Lal (Ed.) Encyclopedia of soil science (3rd ed., pp. 267-269). CRC Press.
- Rhoades, J. D. (1996). Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dis- solved solids. In D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, M. A. Tabatabai, C. T. Johnston, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods, 5.3 (pp. 417-435). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c14 · DOI
- Rocci, K. S., Lavallee, J. M., Stewart, C. E., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2021). Soil organic carbon response to global environmental change depends on its distribution between mineral-associated and particulate organic matter: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 793, 148569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148569 · DOI
- Shewmaker, G. E., & Bohle, M. G. (Eds.). (2010). Pasture and graz- ing management in the northwest (Pacific Northwest Extension Publication No. PNW 214). University of Idaho Extension.
- Sherrod, L. A., Gunn, G., Peterson, G. A., & Kolberg, R. L. (2002). Inor- ganic carbon analysis by modified pressure-calicmeter method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 299-305. https://doi.org/10. 2136/sssaj2002.2990 · DOI
- Sikora, F. S., & Moore, K. P. (2014). Soil test methods from the southeastern United States. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin, 419.
- Smith, J. L., & Doran, J. W. (1996). Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In J. W. Doran & A. J. Jones (Eds.), Methods for assessing soil quality, volume 49 (pp. 169-185). SSSA. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c10 · DOI
- Steffens, M., Kolbl, A., Totsche, K. U., & Kogel-Knabner, I. (2008). Grazing effects on soil chemical and physical properties in a semi- arid steppe of Inner Mongolia (P.R. China). Geoderma, 143, 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.09.004 · DOI
- Stott, D. E., & Moebius-Clune, B. N. (2017). Soil health: Challenges and opportunities. In D. J. Field, C. L. S. Morgan, & A. B. McBratney (Eds.) Global soil security (pp. 109-121). Springer. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-43394-3_10 · DOI
- Teague, W. R. (2018). Forages and pastures symposium: Cover crops in livestock production: Whole-system approach: Cover crops in livestock production: Whole-system approach: Managing grazing to restore soil health and farm livelihoods. Journal of Animal Science, 4, 1519-1530. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skx060 · DOI
- Teague, W. R., Apfelbaum, S., Lal, R., Kreuter, U. P., Rowntree, J., Davies, C. A., Conser, R., Rasmussen, M., Hatfield, J., Want, T., & Byck, P. (2016). The role of ruminants in reducing agricul- ture's carbon footprint in North America. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 71, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.2.156 · DOI · Paper page
- Teague, W. R., Dowhower, S. L., Baker, S. A., Haile, N., DeLaune, P. B., & Conover, D. M. (2011). Grazing management impacts on vegeta- tion, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 141, 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Teague, W. R., Dowhower, S. L., & Waggoner, J. A. (2004). Drought and grazing patch dynamics under different grazing management. Journal of Arid Environments, 58, 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 1963(03)00122-8 · DOI
- Teague, W. R., Provenza, F., Kreuter, U., Steffens, T., & Barnes, M. (2013). Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: Why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience. Jour- nal of Environmental Management, 128, 699-717. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064 · DOI · Paper page
- Thomas, G. W. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. In D. L. Sparks, A. L. Page, P. A. Helmke, R. H. Loeppert, P. N. Soltanpour, M. A. Tabatabai, C. T. Johnston, & M. E. Sumner (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods, 5.3 (pp. 475-490). SSSA. https:// doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c16 · DOI
- Wallenstein, M. D., Haddix, M. L., Lee, D. D., Conant, R. T., & Paul, E. A. (2012). A litter-slurry technique elucidates the key role of enzyme production and microbial dynamics in temperature sensitiv- ity of organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 47, 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.009 · DOI
- Wallenstein, M. D., McMahon, S. K., & Schimel, J. P. (2009). Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils. Global Change Biology, 15, 1631-1639. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01819.x · DOI
- Waring, S. A., & Bremner, J. M. (1964). Ammonium produc- tion in soil under waterlogged conditions as an index of nitro- gen availability. Nature, 201, 951-952. https://doi.org/10.1038/2019 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garcia, L., Stanley, P. L., Sacramento, J. P., Dillon, J. A., Thorbecke, M., Thompson, L. R., Ambike, V., Sharma, P., Xu, S., Chiavegato, M. B., et al. (2026) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2026.104879 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mosier, S., Apfelbaum, S., Byck, P., Ippolito, J., & Cotrufo, M. F.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Applied BioPhysics (United States) (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences Colorado State Univ. Fort Collins CO USA
- Corresponding author
- Mosier, Samantha
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2584-2597
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W4281625706
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Keywords
- rotational grazing, soil health, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, cation exchange capacity, base saturation, soil structure, soil nutrient retention, nitrogen mineralization, cattle grazing, soil organic matter fractions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review