The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efferent fibers of the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. A comparison of the efferent projections of the subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra and globus pallidus
Abstract
A study was made to determine the efferent projections of the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. Because of the impossibility of producing lesions in this nucleus, not involving adjacent structures, lesions were produced by different stereotaxic approaches. Comparisons were made with degeneration resulting from localized lesions in substantia nigra and globus pallidus. Degeneration resulting from these lesions was studied in transverse and sagittal sections stained by the Nauta‐Gygax method. Efferent fibers from the subthalamic nucleus pass through the internal capsule into the medial pallidal segment; a few fibers are distributed to the lateral pallidum. Some subthalamic efferent fibers pass to the contralateral globus pallidus via the dorsal supraoptic decussation, but none projection to the thalamus. Nigral efferent fibers project to parts of the ventral anterior (VAmc) and ventral lateral (VLm) thalamic nuclei. The medial pallidal segment gives fibers to: (1) ventral anterior (VA), ventral lateral (VLo) and centromedian (CM) thalamic nuclei, and (2) the pedunculopontine nucleus. The lateral pallidal segment projects exclusively to the subthalamic nucleus. Thalamic projections of the substania nigra and globus pallidus are distinctive. Subthalamic projections to the globus pallidus are more profuse than those of the substantia nigra. The following hypothesis is presented: Subthalamic dyskinesia, due to lesions in the subthalamic nucleus, is a consequence of removal of inhibitory influences acting upon the medial segment of the globus pallidus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diencephalon of the albino rat: studies on the brain of the rat. No. 2
Gurdjian, E. S. (1927) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.900430102 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Groenewegen, H. J., Berendse, H. W., & Haber, S. N. (1993) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(93)90115-v · Cited by 456
Fiber Connections of the Basal Ganglia
Graybiel, A. M., & Ragsdale, C. W. (1979) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)61309-6 · Cited by 388
Morphometric studies of the neuropathological changes in choreatic diseases
Lange, H., Thörner, G., Hopf, A., & Schröder, K. F. (1976) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(76)90114-3 · Cited by 316
Cortical inputs to the subthalamus: intracellular analysis
Kitai, S. T., & Deniau, J. M. (1981) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(81)91204-x · Cited by 279
Afferent and Efferent Relationships of the Basal Ganglia
Nauta, W. J. H., & Domesick, V. B. (1984) · Novartis Foundation Symposia · doi:10.1002/9780470720882.ch2 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, M. B., & Strominger, N. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1967-07
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-71
- ISSN
- 0002-9106 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-0795
- OpenAlex
- W1993121986
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efferent fibers of the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. A comparison of the efferent projections of the subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra and globus pallidus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aja.1001210105
- The paper
- Carpenter, M. B., & Strominger, N. L. (1967). Efferent fibers of the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. A comparison of the efferent projections of the subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra and globus pallidus. American Journal of Anatomy. https://doi.org/10.1002/aja.1001210105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.