Cited by 79Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportYouth Education and Societal Dynamics

How economic disadvantage affects the availability and nature of mentoring relationships during the transition to adulthood

Open access
Raposa, Elizabeth B., Erickson, Lance D., Hagler, Matthew, Rhodes, Jean E.·2018·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Supportive nonparental adults, particularly nonfamilial adults, provide critical support during the transition to adulthood, opening doors to educational and career paths. This study examined whether economic disadvantage shapes access to these relationships. Results showed that low-income adolescents had reduced access to naturally occurring mentors, and the relationships they did form tended to be close bonds with family and friends, rather than nonfamilial adults. Their mentors were more likely to focus on practical support, and less likely to serve as role models or provide career advice. These effects of socioeconomic status on natural mentoring relationships remained evident, even when accounting for youth race/ethnicity. Findings suggest that networks of support differ depending on a youth's socioeconomic context in ways that could perpetuate social and economic inequalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajcp.12228

Cites

56 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both mentors and program staff reported judgment calls and considerable suspicions on the part of parents that could jeopardize the relationship.

    “However, both mentors and program staff reported judgment calls and considerable suspicions on the part of parents that could jeopardize the relationship [7,157,158,161].”

    From Unpacking Community-Based Youth Mentoring Relationships: An Integrative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says assessments of mentoring relationships were based solely on youths’ perceptions and identifies reports from mentors as a need for future research. That contradicts the attribution of reports to mentors and program staff; the passages also do not describe parental suspicions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Kin relationship ties tend to be more intensive but may be less able to serve as bridging social capital linking youth to educational and occupational opportunities.

    “Although kin relationship ties tend to be more intensive, they may be less able to serve as ‘bridging’ social capital that can link youth to a wider range of educational and occupational opportunities (Raposa, Erikson, Hagler, & Rhodes, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raposa, E. B., Erickson, L. D., Hagler, M., & Rhodes, J. E.
Affiliations
  • William & Mary (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Corresponding author
Raposa, Elizabeth B.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-05
Volume
61
Issue
1-2
Pages
191-203
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W2793984668
Cited by
79
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
FWCI
11.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01‐HD31921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
Keywords
natural mentoring, economic disadvantage, socioeconomic status, coming of age, low-income youth, family and friend relationships, role models, career guidance, social support networks, racial and ethnic differences, social inequality
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Poverty, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review