Cited by 32Neutropenia and Cancer InfectionsBlood disorders and treatmentsOral health in cancer treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of oral mucosal neutrophil counts to detect the onset and resolution of profound neutropenia following high‐dose myelosuppressive chemotherapy

Akpek, Gorgun, Knight, Robert D., Wright, Daniel G.·2003·American Journal of Hematology

Abstract

Severe neutropenia following cytotoxic, anti‐cancer chemotherapy is well‐known to be associated with an increased risk of infections that may be life‐threatening, particularly if not treated immediately. Consequently, serial measurements of neutrophil counts in peripheral blood are done routinely following the administration of high‐dose myelosuppressive chemotherapy in order to monitor the onset, severity, and duration of iatrogenic neutropenia. We have studied a non‐invasive method of quantifying neutrophils recoverable from the oral mucosa, a normal tissue site of neutrophil turnover, as an alternative approach for monitoring severe, chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia. This method is based on the quantification of fluorochrome‐stained neutrophils present in timed mouthwash specimens. Blood neutrophil (ANC) and mucosal neutrophil counts (MNC) were measured repeatedly in 23 patients who had been treated with dose‐intensive chemotherapy for a variety of indications. All 23 patients developed profound neutropenia (ANC < 100/mm 3), and 19 developed neutropenic fever (>101°F) during the 2 weeks following treatment. Nadirs of neutropenia defined by MNC were significantly less prolonged than those defined by the ANC. Furthermore, the onset and resolution of neutropenic fever coincided more precisely with nadirs of neutropenia defined by the MNC than with those defined by the ANC. Our findings indicate that oral mucosal neutrophil counts predict the timing of clinical events associated with neutropenia (e.g., the onset and resolution of fever) with significantly greater accuracy than blood neutrophil counts. Am. J. Hematol. 72:13–19, 2003. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajh.10250

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1182/blood.V95.11.3302.010k35_3302_3309 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akpek, G., Knight, R. D., & Wright, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Wright, Daniel G.
Venue
American Journal of Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-30
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
13-19
ISSN
  • 0361-8609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8652
OpenAlex
W2069818845
Cited by
32
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › General Dentistry › Oral health in cancer treatment
Keywords
chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, neutrophil recovery, absolute neutrophil count
MeSH terms
Acridine Orange, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Blood Cell Count, Cell Count, Cell Movement, Combined Modality Therapy, Convalescence, Female, Fever, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Therapeutic Irrigation, Male, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Middle Aged, Mouth Mucosa, Neoplasms, Neutropenia, Neutrophils, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Staining and Labeling, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review