The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lupus anticoagulant: An analysis of the clinical and laboratory features of 219 cases
Abstract
To define clinical and laboratory characteristics of the lupus anticoagulant (LA), we reviewed our experience (219 subjects). Subjects were divided into group A, those with the LA and the diagnosis of lupus erythematosus, group B, those with the LA but nonlupus diagnoses, and group C, those with drug‐related lupus syndromes. The typical laboratory findings consisted of a prolonged and inhibited plasma clot time (an average of 1.9 times control time) which was proportionately more prolonged than the partial thromboplastin time or activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (average 1.3 times control). Ninety‐eight percent had a prolonged plasma clot time and 94% had a prolonged partial thromboplastin time. The prothrombin and thrombin times were prolonged in 33 and 25% of subjects, respectively. Washed platelets shortened the APTT in the 22 subjects so tested. Monoclonal protein peaks were seen in 7% of patients. Seventeen episodes of bleeding were observed, but in all but one instance there was another hemostatic defect present. In the 18 patients who underwent major operations, there were no hemorrhagic complications. Fifty‐eight episodes of thrombosis were observed with the same incidence in group A (25%) as in group B (26%). Bleeding is rare with the LA but thrombosis is common even without SLE and lupuslike syndromes. The plasma clot time in platelet‐rich plasma is more prolonged, and in our experience, is more sensitive in detecting the lupus anticoagulant than is the partial thromboplastin time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boey, M. L., Colaco, C. B., Gharavi, A. E., Elkon, K. B., Loizou, S., & Hughes, G. R. (1983) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.287.6398.1021 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Immunology and clinical importance of antiphospholipid antibodies
McNeil, H. P., Chesterman, C. N., & Krilis, S. A. (1991) · Advances in immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60777-4 · Cited by 481
Blank, M., Cohen, J., Toder, V, & Shoenfeld, Y. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.8.3069 · Cited by 455
Antiphospholipid Antibodies and venous thromboembolism
Ginsberg, J., Wells, P., Brill-Edwards, P., Donovan, D., Moffatt, K., Johnston, M., Stevens, P., & Hirsh, J. (1995) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v86.10.3685.bloodjournal86103685 · Cited by 365
Prevalence, Follow-Up and Clinical Significance of the Anticardiolipin Antibodies in Normal Subjects
Vila, P., Hernández, M. C., López-Fernández, M. F., & Batlle, J. (1994) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1648840 · Cited by 280
Antiphospholipid syndrome: multiple mechanisms
MACKWORTH-YOUNG, C. G. (2004) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02497.x · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Gastineau, D. A., Kazmier, F. J., Nichols, W. L., & Bowie, E. J. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Hematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-275
- ISSN
- 0361-8609 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8652
- OpenAlex
- W2079180127
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lupus anticoagulant: An analysis of the clinical and laboratory features of 219 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajh.2830190308
- The paper
- Gastineau, D. A., Kazmier, F. J., Nichols, W. L., & Bowie, E. J. W. (1985). Lupus anticoagulant: An analysis of the clinical and laboratory features of 219 cases. American Journal of Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.2830190308
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.