CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60Child Nutrition and Water AccessHistorical Economic and Social StudiesBirth, Development, and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stunting is the natural condition of human height

Open access
Scheffler, Christiane, Hermanussen, Michael·2022·American Journal of Human Biology
DOI 10.1002/ajhb.23693
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives Human body height differs within a wide range and has conventionally been associated with genetic, nutritional, and environmental conditions. In this study, we try to broaden this perspective and add the evolutionary aspect of height differences. Sample and Method We revisited height from archeological data (10 000–1000 BC), and historical growth studies (1877–1913). We analyzed height, weight, and skinfold thickness of 1666 Indonesian schoolchildren from six representative rural and urban elementary schools in Bali and West Timor with a stunting prevalence of up to 50%. Results Stature in the Holocene prehistory of the Near East and Europe varied with maxima for women usually ranging below 160 cm, and maxima for men between 165 and 170 cm. Stature never rose above 170 cm. European and white US-American schoolchildren of the 19th and 20th century were generally short with average height ranging between −1.5 and −2.2 hSDS, yet in the absence of any evidence of chronic or recurrent undernutrition or frequent illness, poverty, or disadvantageous living conditions. The same is found in contemporary Indonesian schoolchildren. Conclusion Stunting is frequently observed not only in the poor, but also in affluent and well-nourished social strata last 10 000 years. Only in very recent history, and only in a few democratic, modern societies, stature has increased beyond the long-lasting historic height average. Viewed from an evolutionary perspective, and considering adaptive plasticity of and community effects on growth, competitive growth and strategic growth adjustments, stunting appears to be the natural condition of human height.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajhb.23693

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bowditch H. P., 1891, The growth of children studied by Galton's method of percentile grades
  2. Combe, 1886, Körperlänge Und Wachstum Der Volksschulkinder in Lausanne, Zeitschrift Für Schulgesundheitspflege, 9, 567
  3. Hermanussen M., 2013, Auxology: Studying human growth and development: Studying human growth and development; with contributions by 56 internationally reputed experts, 1
  4. Igl, 1906, Die Wägungen Und Messungen in Den Volksschulen Zu Brünn, Der Schularzt, 4, 753
  5. Karstädt F., 1888, Über Das Wachstum Der Knaben Vom 6. Bis Zum 16. Lebensjahr, Zeitschrift Für Schulgesundheitspflege, 1, 69
  6. Makower A. A., 1914, Untersuchungen über Wachstum, Zeitschrift Für Schulgesundheitspflege, 27, 97
  7. Mathers K., 1995, Were we ever that big? Gradual increase in hominid body size over time, Homo, 46, 141
  8. NCHS, 2021, Growth Charts ‐ Percentile Data Files with LMS Values
  9. Pulungan A. B., 2018, Indonesian national synthetic growth charge, Acta Scientific Paediatrics, 1, 20
  10. Rietz E., 1904, Das Wachstum Berliner Kinder während der Schuljahre, Archaeology and Anthropology N.F., 1, 30
  11. Staub K., 2013, Auxology: Studying human growth and development: Studying human growth and development; with contributions by 56 internationally reputed experts; with 89 tables, 148
  12. Tajfel H., 1986, The @Nelson‐hall series in psychology. Psychology of intergroup relations, 7
  13. Van Wieringen J. C., 1972, Review, tables and graphs in English belonging to Secular changes of growth 1964‐1966 height and weight surveys in the Netherlands in historical perspective

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Scheffler, C., & Hermanussen, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
  • Pediatrician Altenhof Germany
Corresponding author
Scheffler, Christiane
ORCID
Venue
American Journal of Human Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-11-11
Volume
34
Issue
5
Pages
e23693-e23693
ISSN
  • 1042-0533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6300
DOI
10.1002/ajhb.23693
OpenAlex
W3212477066
Cited by
60
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • American Journal of Human Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
stunting, height, skinfold thickness, elementary school students, Indonesian children, Bali, West Timor, adaptive plasticity, competitive growth
MeSH terms
Body Height, Child, Female, Growth Disorders, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Skinfold Thickness, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review