Cited by 193Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Behavioral phenotypic variation in autism multiplex families: Evidence for a continuous severity gradient

Spiker, Donna, Lotspeich, Linda J., Dimiceli, Sue, Myers, Richard M., Risch, Neil·2002·American Journal of Medical Genetics

Abstract

Recent genetic investigations of autism have studied multiplex families, typically including families with multiple siblings who meet criteria for a diagnosis of autism. However, little is known about the specific behavioral characteristics of siblings with autism in these multiplex families. We investigated the behavioral phenotypic variability and similarity of 351 siblings with autism in 171 multiplex families using cluster analysis and correlations. The results of cluster analyses showed that the individuals with autism could be characterized on a severity gradient: a continuum based on severity of symptoms and impairment as measured by Autism Diagnostic Interview–Revised (ADI‐R) scores, verbal‐nonverbal status, and nonverbal IQ scores. Clusters based on scores from the ADI‐R for the autism diagnostic criteria of the DSM‐IV and nonverbal IQ scores still represented a severity gradient when the effects of verbal‐nonverbal status were removed. The severity gradient was shown to be heritable, with a sib correlation of 30% or a heritability of 60%. In summary, in a sample of 171 autism multiplex families, there was no evidence of discrete behaviorally defined subgroups of affected individuals or families characterized by distinct patterns of behavioral symptoms. Rather, the clusters could be characterized along a single, heritable, continuous severity dimension. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.10188

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts to categorize the heterogeneity in ASDs have been largely unsuccessful because distinct, empirically defined subgroups have yet to be reliably identified.

    “This effort has been largely unsuccessful because distinct, empirically defined subgroups have yet to be reliably identified.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spiker, D., Lotspeich, L. J., Dimiceli, S., Myers, R. M., & Risch, N.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Spiker, Donna
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03-08
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
129-136
ISSN
  • 0148-7299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8628
OpenAlex
W2008999397
Cited by
193
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01mh039437-08)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH052708, MH52708, K01MH001832, 1 K01 MH01832-01, MH-39437)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, multiplex families, autism severity, heritability, siblings, nonverbal intelligence, ADI-R
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Behavior, Family Health, Female, Humans, Male, Nuclear Family, Phenotype, Severity of Illness Index, Twins, Genetic Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review