Cited by 23RNA modifications and cancerTreatment of Major DepressionRNA regulation and disease

Mechanism of METTL3 ‐mediated m6A modification in depression‐induced cognitive deficits

Open access
Niu, Juan, Wang, Bailing, Wang, Tian, Zhou, Tiantian·2022·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics

Abstract

Depressive disorder (DD) is associated with N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) hypermethylation. This study sought to explore the molecular mechanism of Methyltransferase‐like 3 (METTL3) in cognitive deficits of chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS)‐treated rats and provide novel targets for DD treatment. A DD rat model was established via CUMS treatment. Cognitive deficits were assessed via body weighing and behavioral tests. METTL3, microRNA (miR)‐221‐3p, pri‐miR‐221, GRB2‐associated binding protein 1 (Gab1) expressions in hippocampal tissues were detected via RT‐qPCR and Western blotting. m6A, DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8 (DGCR8)‐bound pri‐miR‐221 and pri‐miR‐221 m6A levels were measured. The binding relationship between miR‐221‐3p and Gab1 was testified by dual‐luciferase and RNA pull‐down assays. Rescue experiments were designed to confirm the role of miR‐221‐3p and Gab1. METTL3 was highly expressed in CUMS rats, and silencing METTL3 attenuated cognitive deficits of CUMS rats. METTL3‐mediated m6A modification facilitated processing and maturation of pri‐miR‐221 via DGCR8 to upregulate miR‐221‐3p. miR‐221‐3p targeted Gab1. miR‐221‐3p overexpression or Gab1 downregulation reversed the role of silencing METTL3 in CUMS rats. Overall, METTL3‐mediated m6A modification facilitated processing and maturation of pri‐miR‐221 to upregulate miR‐221‐3p and then inhibit Gab1, thereby aggravating cognitive deficits of CUMS rats.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.b.32892

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niu, J., Wang, B., Wang, T., & Zhou, T.
Affiliations
  • Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University (CN)
  • Qingdao Mental Health Center (CN)
  • Department of Geriatric Psychiatry Qingdao Mental Health Center Qingdao Shandong Province China
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04
Volume
189
Issue
3-4
Pages
86-99
ISSN
  • 1552-4841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-485X
OpenAlex
W4280638829
Cited by
23
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
METTL3, N6-methyladenosine, m6A RNA methylation, depression, cognitive impairment, chronic unpredictable mild stress, miR-221-3p, DGCR8, Gab1, hippocampus, microRNA processing, RNA methylation
MeSH terms
Adenosine, Animals, Cognition, Depression, Methyltransferases, Phosphoproteins, Stress, Psychological, RNA-Binding Proteins, MicroRNAs, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review