Cited by 14Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityGenomics and Rare DiseasesFamily and Disability Support Research

Attitudes about the use of internet support groups and the impact among parents of children with Cornelia de Lange syndrome

Cacioppo, Cara N., Conway, Laura J., Mehta, Devanshi, Krantz, Ian D., Noon, Sarah E.·2016·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics

Abstract

There is an abundance of information in the literature on patient experiences with Internet support groups (ISGs). However, studies exploring these experiences in a rare disease population are scarce, even though these families are often at a disadvantage for resources, reliable information, and support. The aim of the current study was to explore the experiences with ISGs for parents of children with Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS), a rare genetic diagnosis, in order to better understand the impact on emotional support and their child's medical care. Focus groups were conducted to inform the design of a large‐scale internet survey. The survey asked parents closed‐ and open‐ended questions regarding experiences with ISGs, with a focus on the psychosocial, medical, and logistical aspects. The survey found that 141/170 (82.6%) respondents have visited an Internet‐based support group to find support or information about their child's CdLS diagnosis. The majority of respondents (71.7%) reported that ISGs have been helpful in finding emotional support, with the most common areas impacted as a result of ISG participation being behavior toward their children and family dynamic. Regarding medical care, most respondents (63.9%) reported that ISGs have been helpful in finding medical information and support, with the most commonly impacted areas of their child's care including day‐to‐day management, diet, therapy interventions, and healthcare providers. These findings provide a greater understanding of the role of Internet networking in healthcare and may inform future approaches to medical care and psychosocial support for rare, complex genetic diagnoses. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.c.31504

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacioppo, C. N., Conway, L. J., Mehta, D., Krantz, I. D., & Noon, S. E.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Noon, Sarah E.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05-10
Volume
172
Issue
2
Pages
229-236
ISSN
  • 1552-4868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4876
OpenAlex
W2367285664
Cited by
14
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C Seminars in Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for CdLS
  • Arcadia University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
Cornelia de Lange syndrome, online support groups, emotional support, psychosocial support, health care, family dynamics, online health information, rare diseases, patient experience
MeSH terms
Attitude, Child, De Lange Syndrome, Humans, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review