The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Abstract
A large body of theoretical and empirical research suggests that kinship influences the development and maintenance of social bonds among group‐living female mammals, and that human females may be unusual in the extent to which individuals form differentiated social relationships with nonrelatives. Here we combine behavioral observations of party association, spatial proximity, grooming, and space use with extensive molecular genetic analyses to determine whether female chimpanzees form strong social bonds with unrelated individuals of the same sex. We compare our results with those obtained from male chimpanzees who live in the same community and have been shown to form strong social bonds with each other. We demonstrate that party association is as good a predictor of spatial proximity and grooming in females as it is in males, that the highest party association indices are consistently found between female dyads, that the sexes do not differ in the long‐term stability of their party association patterns, and that these results cannot be explained as a by‐product of the tendency of females to selectively range in particular areas of the territory. We also show that close kin (i.e. mother–daughter and sibling dyads) are very rare, indicating that the vast majority of female dyads that form strong social bonds are not closely related. Additional analyses reveal that “subgroups” of females, consisting of individuals who frequently associate with one another in similar areas of the territory, do not consist of relatives. This suggests that a passive form of kin‐biased dispersal, involving the differential migration of females from neighboring communities into subgroups, was also unlikely to be occurring. These results show that, as in males, kinship plays a limited role in structuring the intrasexual social relationships of female chimpanzees. Am. J. Primatol. 71:840–851, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Finding community structure in very large networks
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E. J., & Moore, C. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.066111 · Cited by 7,390
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 · Cited by 4,144
Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.
Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A. R., & Updegraff, J. A. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.3.411 · Cited by 3,308
Newman, M. E. J. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.056131 · Cited by 2,476
Lusseau, D., Schneider, K., Boisseau, O. J., Haase, P., Slooten, E., & Dawson, S. M. (2003) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0651-y · Cited by 2,277
The Evolution of Altruistic Behavior
Hamilton, W. D. (1963) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/497114 · Cited by 2,020
An Ecological Model of Female-Bonded Primate Groups
Wrangham, R. W. (1980) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853980x00447 · Cited by 1,977
Core Discussion Networks of Americans
Marsden, P. V. (1987) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095397 · Cited by 1,921
Cited by
The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival
Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2009) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0681 · Cited by 717
Social Bonds Enhance Reproductive Success in Male Macaques
Schülke, O., Bhagavatula, J., Vigilant, L., & Ostner, J. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.058 · Cited by 555
Self-citationUrinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees
Crockford, C., Wittig, R. M., Langergraber, K., Ziegler, T. E., Zuberbühler, K., & Deschner, T. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2765 · Cited by 347
Self-citationWittig, R. M., Crockford, C., Deschner, T., Langergraber, K. E., Ziegler, T. E., & Zuberbühler, K. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3096 · Cited by 235
Self-citationFemale chacma baboons form strong, equitable, and enduring social bonds
Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2010) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0986-0 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Langergraber, K., Mitani, J., & Vigilant, L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Primatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-27
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 840-851
- ISSN
- 0275-2565 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2345
- OpenAlex
- W1973569133
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 102
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajp.20711
- The paper
- Langergraber, K., Mitani, J., & Vigilant, L. (2009). Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.