Cited by 717Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival

Open access
Silk, Joan B., Beehner, Jacinta C., Bergman, Thore J., Crockford, Catherine, Engh, Anne L., Moscovice, Liza R., Wittig, Roman M., Seyfarth, Robert M. +1 more·2009·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Sociality has evolved in many animal taxa, but primates are unusual because they establish highly differentiated bonds with other group members. Such bonds are particularly pronounced among females in species like baboons, with female philopatry and male dispersal. These relationships seem to confer a number of short-term benefits on females, and sociality enhances infant survival in some populations. However, the long-term consequences of social bonds among adult females have not been well established. Here we provide the first direct evidence that social relationships among female baboons convey fitness benefits. In a group of free-ranging baboons, Papio cynocephalus ursinus , the offspring of females who formed strong social bonds with other females lived significantly longer than the offspring of females who formed weaker social bonds. These survival benefits were independent of maternal dominance rank and number of kin and extended into offspring adulthood. In particular, females who formed stronger bonds with their mothers and adult daughters experienced higher offspring survival rates than females who formed weaker bonds. For females lacking mothers or adult daughters, offspring survival was closely linked to bonds between maternal sisters. These results parallel those from human studies, which show that greater social integration is generally associated with reduced mortality and better physical and mental health, particularly for women.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2009.0681

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bentley-Condit, V. K. & Smith, E. O. 1999 Female dominance and female social relationships among yellow baboons ( Papio hamadryas cynocephalus ). Am. J. Primatol. 47 , 321-334. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)47: 4 , 321::AID-AJP4 . 3.0.CO;2-D) · DOI
  2. Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M. & Wrangham, R. W. 2008 Female competition over core areas among Kanyawara chimpanzees, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Intl. J. Primatol. 29 , 931-947. (doi:10.1007/s10764008-9276-3) · DOI
  3. Voland, E., Chasiotis, A. & Schiefenhovel, W. (eds) 2005 Grandmotherhood: the evolutionary significance of the second half of life . New Brunswisk, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., Wittig, R. M., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Silk, Joan B.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-06-10
Volume
276
Issue
1670
Pages
3099-3104
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2126186430
Cited by
717
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 35
FWCI
39.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd029433-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH064232, MH62249, R01MH062249)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-29433)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
social capital, social bonds, female baboons, offspring survival, maternal kinship, female philopatry, primate sociality, kin selection, social integration, primate health
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Longevity, Social Behavior, Papio cynocephalus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review