Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long‐term treatment with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin has minor effect on clinical laboratory markers in middle‐aged marmosets

Sills, Aubrey M., Artavia, Joselyn M., DeRosa, Brian D., Ross, Corinna N., Salmon, Adam B.·2019·American Journal of Primatology

Abstract

Interventions to extend lifespan and improve health with increasing age would have significant impact on a growing aged population. There are now several pharmaceutical interventions that extend lifespan in laboratory rodent models with rapamycin, an inhibitor of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) being the most well studied. In this study, we report on the hematological effects in a cohort of middle‐aged common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) that were enrolled in a study to test the effects of daily rapamycin treatment on aging in this species. In addition, we assessed whether sex was a significant factor in either baseline assessment or as an interaction with rapamycin treatment. Among our cohort at baseline, we found few differences in either basic morphology or hematological markers of blood cell counts, metabolism or inflammation between male and female marmosets. After dosing with rapamycin, surprisingly we found trough blood concentrations of rapamycin were significantly lower in female compared to male marmosets. Despite this pharmacological difference, both sexes had only minor changes in cellular blood counts after 9 months of rapamycin. These data then suggest that the potential clinical hematological side effects of rapamycin are not likely outcomes of long‐term rapamycin in relatively healthy, middle‐aged marmosets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajp.22927

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a subset of 6 marmosets treated with rapamycin or vehicle for nine months, 2 rapamycin-treated animals showed an increase in fasting blood glucose, and 2 showed an increase in triglycerides, suggesting the possibility of some inhibition of TORC2 at this dose level.

    “In the subset of 6 animals treated with rapamycin or vehicle for nine months, 2 rapamycin-treated animals showed an increase in fasting blood glucose, and 2 rapamycin-treated animals shown an increase in triglycerides suggesting the possibility of some inhibition of TORC2 at this dose level 47.”

    From Targeting the biology of aging with mTOR inhibitors (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

  • Initial studies suggested that rapamycin, dosed at ~1 mg/kg via the diet, was well tolerated in marmosets, with only minor effects on hematological parameters, and no statistically significant changes in blood glucose, cholesterol, or triglyceride levels.

    “Initial studies suggested that rapamycin, dosed at ~1 mg/kg of body weight via the diet, was well tolerated, with only minor effects of rapamycin on hematological parameters, and no statistically significant changes in blood glucose, cholesterol, or triglyceride levels47.”

    From Targeting the biology of aging with mTOR inhibitors (2023) · cites this paper as [47]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1007/s11357-017-9994-6 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/gerona/glw064 · DOI
  3. 10.1023/A:1005433722475 · DOI
  4. 10.7554/eLife.16351 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/acel.12203 · DOI
  6. 10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00160 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.exger.2016.01.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00007890-200005270-00019 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1007/s11357-018-0036-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/s11357-017-9967-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11357-017-9960-3 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.exger.2017.12.026 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1097/00007890-200004150-00009 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1215135 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.3402/pba.v6.31793 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/acel.12194 · DOI
  18. 10.1194/jlr.M100392-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/s10522-012-9388-1 · DOI
  20. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000100 · DOI
  21. 10.18632/aging.100843 · DOI
  22. 10.18632/aging.101340 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s11357-018-0024-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1590/0103-8478cr20120822 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M112.435123 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/gerona/glu101 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ajpa.22110 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s11357-017-9972-z · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.18632/aging.101401 · DOI
  30. 10.1001/jama.2007.26 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1007/s10329-004-0088-6 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/gerona/glt056 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sills, A. M., Artavia, J. M., DeRosa, B. D., Ross, C. N., & Salmon, A. B.
Affiliations
The Sam and Ann Barshop Institute for Longevity and Aging Studies UT Health San Antonio San Antonio Texas
Venue
American Journal of Primatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-12
Volume
81
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0275-2565
  • 1098-2345
Cited by
17
References
5
Language
en
Funders
National Institute on Aging (P30 044271, P30 AG013319, R01 AG050797)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review