Cited by 811Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Dental wear in the Libben population: its functional pattern and role in the determination of adult skeletal age at death

Lovejoy, C. Owen·1985·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Modal patterns of occlusal attrition are presented for the Libben population based on a sample of 332 adult dentitions. Maxillas and mandibles were reviewed independently by seriation prior to assessment of complete dentitions. The Spearman rank order coefficient for upper and lower dentitions was.96. Wear patterns are very similar to those reported by Murphy (1959a: Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 17:167–178) for Australian aborigines. There were no significant sexual differences in wear rate. Dental wear is concluded to be a highly reliable and important indicator of adult age at death for skeletal populations if seriation procedures are employed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.1330680105

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CT assessment of preservation status, age at death, and pathologies followed protocols published before.

    “We analyzed the CT images of the mummy to assess the preservation status, age at death, and pathologies according to protocols published before (12–16).”
  • There is mild attrition of the maxillary and mandibular teeth.

    “Mild attrition of the maxillary and mandibular teeth”
  • Mild to moderate attrition of the teeth is observed: grade G in the mandibular teeth (corresponding to 35-40 years), and grade H in the maxillary teeth (corresponding to 40-50 years).

    “Mild to moderate attrition of the teeth is observed: grade G in the mandibular teeth (corresponding to 35–40 years), and grade H in the maxillary teeth (corresponding to 40–50 years) (14, 15).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lovejoy, C. O.
Affiliations
Kent State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lovejoy, C. Owen
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-09
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
47-56
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2101264746
Cited by
811
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
49.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
tooth wear, maxilla, mandible
MeSH terms
Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, Adolescent, Adult, Age Determination by Skeleton, Age Determination by Teeth, Age Factors, Aging, Child, Death, Dentition, Female, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, Mandible, Maxilla, Middle Aged, Ohio, Paleontology, Sex Factors, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review