The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Body size and proportions in early hominids
Abstract
The discovery of several associated body parts of early hominids whose taxonomic identity is known inspires this study of body size and proportions in early hominids. The approach consists of finding the relationship between various measures of skeletal size and body mass in modern ape and human specimens of known body weight. This effort leads to 78 equations which predict body weight from 95 fossil specimens ranging in geological age between 4 and 1.4 mya. Predicted weights range from 10 kg to over 160 kg, but the partial associated skeletons provide the essential clues as to which predictions are most reliable. Measures of hindlimb joint size are the best and probably those equations based on the human samples are better than those based on all Hominoidea. Using hindlimb joint size of specimens of relatively certain taxonomy and assuming these measures were more like those of modern humans than of apes, the male and female averages are as follows: Australopithecus afarensis, 45 and 29 kg; A. africanus, 41 and 30 kg; A. robustus, 40 and 32 kg; A. boisei, 49 and 34 kg; H. habilis, 52 and 32 kg. These values appear to be consistent with the range of size variation seen in the entire postcranial samples that can be assigned to species. If hominoid (i.e., ape and human combined) proportions are assumed, the males would be 10 to 23 kg larger and the females 4 to 10 kg larger.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Pilbeam, D., & Gould, S. J. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.186.4167.892 · Cited by 416
Cited by
Body mass and encephalization in Pleistocene Homo.
Ruff, C. B., Trinkaus, E., & Holliday, T. W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387173a0 · Cited by 896
Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment.
Geary, D. C. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.55 · Cited by 835
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity
Hawkes, K. (2003) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.10156 · Cited by 582
Hominin life history: reconstruction and evolution
Robson, S. L., & Wood, B. (2008) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00867.x · Cited by 374
Metadata
- Authors
- McHenry, H. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 407-431
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2088101833
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body size and proportions in early hominids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.1330870404
- The paper
- McHenry, H. M. (1992). Body size and proportions in early hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330870404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.