Cited by 374Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyPrimate Behavior and EcologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Hominin life history: reconstruction and evolution

Open access
Robson, Shannen L., Wood, Bernard·2008·Journal of Anatomy

Abstract

In this review we attempt to reconstruct the evolutionary history of hominin life history from extant and fossil evidence. We utilize demographic life history theory and distinguish life history variables, traits such as weaning, age at sexual maturity, and life span, from life history‐related variables such as body mass, brain growth, and dental development. The latter are either linked with, or can be used to make inferences about, life history, thus providing an opportunity for estimating life history parameters in fossil taxa. We compare the life history variables of modern great apes and identify traits that are likely to be shared by the last common ancestor of Pan‐Homo and those likely to be derived in hominins. All great apes exhibit slow life histories and we infer this to be true of the last common ancestor of Pan‐Homo and the stem hominin. Modern human life histories are even slower, exhibiting distinctively long post‐menopausal life spans and later ages at maturity, pointing to a reduction in adult mortality since the Pan‐Homo split. We suggest that lower adult mortality, distinctively short interbirth intervals, and early weaning characteristic of modern humans are derived features resulting from cooperative breeding. We evaluate the fidelity of three life history‐related variables, body mass, brain growth and dental development, with the life history parameters of living great apes. We found that body mass is the best predictor of great ape life history events. Brain growth trajectories and dental development and eruption are weakly related proxies and inferences from them should be made with caution. We evaluate the evidence of life history‐related variables available for extinct species and find that prior to the transitional hominins there is no evidence of any hominin taxon possessing a body size, brain size or aspects of dental development much different from what we assume to be the primitive life history pattern for the Pan‐Homo clade. Data for life history‐related variables among the transitional hominin grade are consistent and none agrees with a modern human pattern. Aside from mean body mass, adult brain size, crown and root formation times, and the timing and sequence of dental eruption of Homo erectus are inconsistent with that of modern humans.Homo antecessor fossil material suggests a brain size similar to that of Homo erectus s. s.,and crown formation times that are not yet modern, though there is some evidence of modern human‐like timing of tooth formation and eruption. The body sizes, brain sizes, and dental development of Homo heidelbergensis and Homo neanderthalensis are consistent with a modern human life history but samples are too small to be certain that they have life histories within the modern human range. As more life history‐related variable information for hominin species accumulates we are discovering that they can also have distinctive life histories that do not conform to any living model. At least one extinct hominin subclade,Paranthropus, has a pattern of dental life history‐related variables that most likely set it apart from the life histories of both modern humans and chimpanzees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00867.x

Cites

273 of 273 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bongaarts J, Potter RG (1983) Fertility, Biology, and Behavior: An Analysis and Proximate Determinants. New York: Academic Press.
  2. Dienske H (1986) A comparative approach to the question of why human infants develop so slowly. In Primate Ontogeny, Cognition and Social Behaviour (eds Else JG, Lee PC), pp. 147-154. New York: Cambridge University Press,.
  3. Groves CP (2001) Primate Taxonomy. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  4. Harvey PH, Martin RD, Clutton-Brock TH (1987) Life histories in comparative perspective. In Primate Societies (eds Smuts BB, Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, Wrangham R, Struhsaker TT), pp. 181- 196. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  5. Kuykendall K (2002) An assessment of radiographic and histolog- ical standards of dental development in chimpanzees. In Human Evolution through Developmental Change (ed. McNamara JA), pp. 281-304. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  6. Malenky RK, Kuroda S, Vineberg EO, Wrangham RW (1994) The significance of terrestrial herbaceous foods for bonobos, chimpanzees, and gorillas. In Chimpanzee Cultures (eds Wrang- ham RW, McGrew MC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG, Marquardt LA), pp. 59-76. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  7. van Schaik CP, Barrickman N, Bastian ML, Krakauer EB, van Noordwijk MA (2006) Primate life histories and the role of brains. In The Evolution of Human Life History (eds Paine RL, Hawkes K), pp. 127-153. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  8. Southgate DAT, Hey EN (1976) Chemical and biochemical develop- ment of the human fetus. In The Biology of Human Growth (eds Roberts DF, Thompson AM), pp. 195-209. London: Halsted Press.
  9. Wolpoff MH (1999) Paleoanthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robson, S. L., & Wood, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Robson, Shannen L.
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04
Volume
212
Issue
4
Pages
394-425
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W2096284593
Cited by
374
References
273
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 28
FWCI
21.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
George Washington University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
life history evolution, weaning age, age at sexual maturity, lifespan, adult mortality, birth interval, cooperative breeding, great apes, body mass, brain growth, tooth development, tooth eruption timing, Homo erectus, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Neanderthals
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthropology, Physical, Brain, Dentition, Biological Evolution, Life Cycle Stages, Reproduction, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review