Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residence rule flexibility and descent groups dynamics shape uniparental genetic diversities in South East Asia

Ly, Goki, Alard, Bérénice, Laurent, Romain, Lafosse, Sophie, Toupance, Bruno, Monidarin, Chou, Diffloth, Gérard, Bourdier, Frédéric, Evrard, Olivier, Pavard, Samuel, Chaix, Raphaëlle·2018·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Objectives: Social organization plays a major role in shaping human population genetic diversity. In particular, matrilocal populations tend to exhibit less mitochondrial diversity than patrilocal populations, and the other way around for Y chromosome diversity. However, several studies have not replicated such findings. The objective of this study is to understand the reasons for such inconsistencies and further evaluate the influence of social organization on genetic diversity. Materials and Methods: We explored uniparental diversity patterns using mitochondrial HV1 sequences and 17 Y‐linked short tandem repeats (STRs) in 12 populations (n = 619) from mainland South–East Asia exhibiting a wide range of social organizations, along with quantitative ethno‐demographic information sampled at the individual level. Results: MtDNA diversity was lower in matrilocal than in multilocal and patrilocal populations while Y chromosome diversity was similar among these social organizations. The reasons for such asymmetry at the genetic level were understood by quantifying sex‐specific migration rates from our ethno‐demographic data: while female migration rates varied between social organizations, male migration rates did not. This unexpected lack of difference in male migrations resulted from a higher flexibility in residence rule in patrilocal than in matrilocal populations. In addition, our data suggested an impact of clan fission process on uniparental genetic patterns. Conclusions: The observed lack of signature of patrilocality on Y chromosome patterns might be attributed to the higher residence flexibility in the studied patrilocal populations, thus providing a potential explanation for the apparent discrepancies between social and genetic structures. Altogether, this study highlights the need to quantify the actual residence and descent patterns to fit social to genetic structures.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.23374

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Besaggio D., 2007, Genetic variation in Northern Thailand Hill Tribes: Origins and relationships with social structure and linguistic differences, BMC Evol Biol, 7, S12, 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S2-S12 · DOI
  3. Bourdier F., 2006, The mountain of precious stones. Ratanakiri: Cambodia: Essays in social anthropology
  4. 10.1525/aa.1963.65.1.02a00100 · DOI
  5. 10.1525/ae.1976.3.2.02a00030 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/425938 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dessaint W. Y., 1981, The T'in (Mal), dry rice cultivators of Northern Thailand, J Siam Soc, 69, 107
  8. 10.1111/mec.12001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0006-3207(75)90052-X · DOI
  10. Dournes J., 1972, Paris: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie n°77)
  11. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb41805.x · DOI
  12. 10.4000/books.irdeditions.2366 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01186.x · DOI
  15. Godelier M., 2004, Métamorphoses de la parenté
  16. 10.1093/molbev/msv102 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/ncomms1235 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.0409253102 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05406.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Izikowitz K. G., 1951, Lamet hill peasants in French Indochina
  21. 10.1086/346065 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1007/s004140050051 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03281.x · DOI
  24. Kumar V., 2006, Global patterns in human mitochondrial DNA and Y‐chromosome variation caused by spatial instability of the local cultural processes, PLoS Genet, 2, 420
  25. LeBar F. M., 1964, Ethnic groups of mainland Southeast Asia, Human Relations Area Files.
  26. Ledgerwood J. L., 1995, Khmer kinship—The matriliny matriarchy myth, J Anthropol Res, 51, 247, 10.1086/jar.51.3.3630360 · DOI
  27. Levinson D., 1980, Toward explaining human culture: A critical review of the findings of worldwide cross‐cultural research, New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
  28. Lindell K., 1979, Kinship and marriage in Northern Kammu villages: The Kinship model, Sociologus, 29, 60
  29. 10.1186/2041-2223-5-13 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05689.x · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2 · DOI
  32. Martel G., 1975, Lovea. Village des environs d'Angkor. Aspects démographiques, économiques et sociologiques du monde rural cambodgien dans la province de Siem‐Réap
  33. Matras‐Troubetzkoy J., 1983, Un Village En Foret. L'essartage Chez Les Brou Du Cambodge
  34. 10.1093/genetics/142.3.1061 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/ajpa.22933 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/ng711 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.12 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Schmutz J., 2013, The Ta'Oi Language and People, Mon‐Khmer Stud, 42, i
  39. 10.1038/3088 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1007/s12110-011-9105-9 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/genetics/98.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1038/jhg.2014.62 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/molbev/mss328 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.gde.2006.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1002/bies.20378 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ly, G., Alard, B., Laurent, R., Lafosse, S., Toupance, B., Monidarin, C., Diffloth, G., Bourdier, F., Evrard, O., Pavard, S., & Chaix, R.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-23
Volume
165
Issue
3
Pages
480-491
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
20
References
3
Language
en
Funders
ANR (JC09_441218)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review