Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Molecular analysis reveals tighter social regulation of immigration in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations.

Hamilton, Grant, Stoneking, Mark, Excoffier, Laurent·2005·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Human social organization can deeply affect levels of genetic diversity. This fact implies that genetic information can be used to study social structures, which is the basis of ethnogenetics. Recently, methods have been developed to extract this information from genetic data gathered from subdivided populations that have gone through recent spatial expansions, which is typical of most human populations. Here, we perform a Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial and Y chromosome diversity in three matrilocal and three patrilocal groups from northern Thailand to infer the number of males and females arriving in these populations each generation and to estimate the age of their range expansion. We find that the number of male immigrants is 8 times smaller in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations, whereas women move 2.5 times more in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations. In addition to providing genetic quantification of sex-specific dispersal rates in human populations, we show that although men and women are exchanged at a similar rate between matrilocal populations, there are far fewer men than women moving into patrilocal populations. This finding is compatible with the hypothesis that men are strictly controlling male immigration and promoting female immigration in patrilocal populations and that immigration is much less regulated in matrilocal populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0409253102

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1016/S0002-9297(07)62955-3 · DOI
  2. 10.1086/302749 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.071036898 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/386292 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/27103 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/3088 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1086/302451 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1086/316949 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/316890 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003906 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/ng1428 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15140 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10597 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/ng711 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/molbev/msg009 · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02004.x · DOI
  17. 10.1093/genetics/162.4.2025 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026091 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/genetics/145.2.505 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nrg1318 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.0306899100 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002141 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1177 · DOI
  24. 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00582.x · DOI
  25. 10.1086/302770 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/ng0497-363 · DOI
  27. 10.1086/380911 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb05657.x · DOI
  29. 10.1086/204474 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lebar F. M. Hickey G. C. & Musgrave J. K. (1964) Ethnic Groups of Mainland Southeast Asia (Human Relations Area Files Press New Haven CT).
  31. 10.1534/genetics.104.034199 · DOI
  32. 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1302 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/genetics/159.2.893 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/35047064 · DOI
  35. Rogers, A. R. & Jorde, L. B. (1995) Hum. Biol. 67, 1–36.7721272
  36. 10.1093/genetics/161.3.1209 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/genetics/31.1.39 · DOI
  38. 10.1098/rstb.1995.0090 · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2004.00092.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1086/jar.59.1.3631445 · DOI
  41. 10.1086/382256 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Foley, R. A. & Lahr, M. M. (2001) in Genes, Fossils, and Behavior, eds. Donnelly, P. & Foley, R. A. (IOS, Amsterdam), Vol. 310, pp. 223–245.

Cited by

See all 95

Metadata

Authors
Hamilton, G., Stoneking, M., & Excoffier, L.
Affiliations
Computational and Molecular Population Genetics Laboratory, Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; and School of Integrative Biology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2005-05-13
Volume
102
Issue
21
Pages
7476-7480
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
95
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular analysis reveals tighter social regulation of immigration in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0409253102
The paper
Hamilton, G., Stoneking, M., & Excoffier, L. (2005). Molecular analysis reveals tighter social regulation of immigration in patrilocal populations than in matrilocal populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409253102