Cited by 16Ethics in Clinical ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Racially diverse participant registries to facilitate the recruitment of African Americans into presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease studies

Cocroft, Shelytia, Welsh‐Bohmer, Kathleen A., Plassman, Brenda L., Chanti‐Ketterl, Marianne, Edmonds, Henry, Gwyther, Lisa, McCart, Michelle, MacDonald, Heather +2 more·2020·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: The Alzheimer's Disease Prevention Registry (ADPR) of the Joseph and Kathleen Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center at Duke University has been successful in achieving a racially diverse and “research ready” cohort of cognitively healthy volunteers. Methods: The ADPR is based on an infrastructure that includes: (1) an administrative leadership team; (2) a coordinating center; (3) an IT management team; (4) a community engagement team; and (5) collaborations with study partners across disciplines. Results: The ADPR currently has more than 4677 members, 26% of whom are African American. The ADPR has supported 21 studies including 8 biomarker studies, 7 clinical trials, 4 cognitive neuroscience studies, and 2 studies assessing novel computerized measures. Discussion: We describe our experiences establishing and maintaining a diverse ADPR as well as insights on recruitment strategies to increase the representation of African Americans in Alzheimer's disease studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.12048

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A frequently cited reason for underrepresentation of certain minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is pervasive mistrust in the healthcare system, often attributed to historical instances of mistreatment and exploitation.

    “A frequently cited reason for the underrepresentation of certain minority ethnic groups in clinical trials is a pervasive mistrust in the healthcare system. This is often attributed to historical instances of mistreatment and exploitation.”
  • The Tuskegee Syphilis study and the Henrietta Lacks incident are examples of unethical and exploitative research.

    “Two infamous examples of such unethical and exploitative research are often quoted: the Tuskegee Syphilis study, in which Black men were intentionally denied treatment for syphilis; and the Henrietta Lacks (HeLa) incident, where the patient’s cancer cells were provided to researchers unbeknownst to her.”
  • A total of 12 included articles were assessed with an MMAT score below 3, including two RCTs, three non-randomised studies, six quantitative descriptive studies and one mixed methods study.

    “A total of 12 articles were assessed with a score of below 3. This included two RCTs [61, 66], three non-randomised studies [15, 46, 64], six quantitative descriptive studies [9, 37, 38, 40, 57, 58] and one mixed methods study [60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cocroft, S., Welsh‐Bohmer, K. A., Plassman, B. L., Chanti‐Ketterl, M., Edmonds, H., Gwyther, L., McCart, M., MacDonald, H., Potter, G., & Burke, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Joseph and Kathleen Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Duke University Durham North Carolina
Corresponding author
Cocroft, Shelytia
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-06-16
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
1107-1114
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W3035308940
Cited by
16
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Male, Registries, Patient Selection, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review