Evaluation of [ 3 H]SynVesT‐1 binding parameters in post‐mortem brain tissue from control and Alzheimer's Disease
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background There is currently a need for an imaging biomarker of synaptic density that would allow the tracking of changes associated with neurodegeneration, disease progression and possible therapeutic response. The aim of this study was to use homogenate binding techniques to assess [ 3 H]SynVesT‐1 binding to synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), found in pre‐synaptic terminals, to understand its potential as a synaptic density biomarker. Method Postmortem brain tissues from 70 subjects, across 3 different regions (entorhinal cortex (EC), cerebellum and centrum semiovale) and two homogenate fractions (total homogenate (TH) and synaptoneurosome (SN)) were used to determine the binding parameters (binding affinity (K D ), and maximal binding sites (B MAX )) of [ 3 H]SynVesT‐1. Sex‐matched subjects were initially divided into 3 groups: control (Braak Stage 0‐II), early Alzheimer's Disease (E‐AD) (Braak Stage III‐IV) and late AD (L‐AD) (Braak Stage V‐VI). Result A saturable specific binding signal was observed in EC and cerebellum homogenates from all three groups. A suitable binding curve could not be applied to the centrum semiovale, with less specific binding, and greater variability across cases. The K D of [ 3 H]SynVesT‐1 was comparable across groups and homogenate preparations (TH and SN), ranging from 3‐7 nM. In initial groupwise analyses, the B MAX ranged from 2278 ± 101 fmol/mg protein in L‐AD, to 2788 ± 109 fmol/mg protein in control in the TH preparations from the EC. SN homogenates for the EC show B MAX ranged from 3958 ± 183 fmol/mg protein in L‐AD, to 5193 ± 316 fmol/mg protein in E‐AD. In cerebellum TH, B MAX ranged from 2263 ± 88 fmol/mg protein in control, to 2681 ± 186 fmol/mg protein in E‐AD. In cerebellum SN homogenates, B MAX ranged from 2790± 134 fmol/mg protein in L‐AD, to 4085 ± 239 fmol/mg protein in E‐AD. Conclusion Initial results show group‐wise differences in the B MAX of [ 3 H]SynVesT‐1 in EC, with E‐AD subjects showing greater binding signal. This may suggest compensatory mechanisms occurring early in the progression of the disease. This is part of the SV2A PET Project, a program of the FNIH Biomarker Consortium.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SV2A levels eventually decrease in correlation with tau accumulation and glymphatic impairment in late-stage Alzheimer's.
“While SV2A levels eventually decrease in correlation with tau accumulation and glymphatic impairment in late-stage Alzheimer’s, certain regions may show a compensatory increase in SV2A binding during early disease stages [93,94,95].”
From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [93]
The Results (page not specified) report lower SV2A-tracer binding in late-stage than early-stage Alzheimer’s groups in some tissue preparations, and the Conclusion suggests a possible compensatory increase early in disease. The paper does not assess a correlation with tau accumulation or glymphatic impairment, and binding measurements do not directly establish SV2A levels. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCertain regions may show a compensatory increase in SV2A binding during early disease stages.
“While SV2A levels eventually decrease in correlation with tau accumulation and glymphatic impairment in late-stage Alzheimer’s, certain regions may show a compensatory increase in SV2A binding during early disease stages [93,94,95].”
From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse
Ramírez-Expósito, M. J., Cueto-Ureña, C., & Martínez-Martos, J. M. (2026) · Current Issues in Molecular Biology · doi:10.3390/cimb48010088 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“While SV2A levels eventually decrease in correlation with tau accumulation and glymphatic impairment in late-stage Alzheimer’s, certain regions may show a compensatory increase in SV2A binding during early disease stages [93–95].”
- Authors
- Lemoine, L., Kulagowska, L., Bonsall, D., King, D., Gladstein, S., Bevis, A., Sabandal, M., Wells, L., Finnema, S. J., Spires‐Jones, T. L., & FNIH SV2A Project Team
- Affiliations
- Perceptive, London, United Kingdom
- UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- e103316-e103316
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC12742240
- OpenAlex
- W7117310322
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- SV2A
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Middle Aged, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Biomarkers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review