Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dopaminergic modulation of cortical function in patients with Parkinson's disease

Mattay, Venkata S., Tessitore, Alessandro, Callicott, Joseph H., Bertolino, Alessandro, Goldberg, Terry E., Chase, Thomas N., Hyde, Thomas M., Weinberger, Daniel R.·2002·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease suffer not only from classic motor symptoms, but from deficits in cognitive function, primarily those subserved by the prefrontal cortex as well. The aim of the current study was to investigate the modulatory effects of dopaminergic therapy on neural systems subserving working memory and motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease. Ten patients with stage I and II Parkinson's disease were studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging, during a relatively hypodopaminergic state (ie, 12 hours after a last dose of dopamimetic treatment), and again during a dopamine‐replete state. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed under three conditions: a working memory task, a cued sensorimotor task and rest. Consistent with prior data, the cortical motor regions activated during the motor task showed greater activation during the dopamine‐replete state; however, the cortical regions subserving working memory displayed greater activation during the hypodopaminergic state. Interestingly, the increase in cortical activation during the working memory task in the hypodopaminergic state positively correlated with errors in task performance, and the increased activation in the cortical motor regions during the dopamine‐replete state was positively correlated with improvement in motor function. These results support evidence from basic research that dopamine modulates cortical networks subserving working memory and motor function via two distinct mechanisms: nigrostriatal projections facilitate motor function indirectly via thalamic projections to motor cortices, whereas the mesocortical dopaminergic system facilitates working memory function via direct inputs to prefrontal cortex. The results are also consistent with evidence that the hypodopaminergic state is associated with decreased efficiency of prefrontal cortical information processing and that dopaminergic therapy improves the physiological efficiency of this region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10078

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 402

Metadata

Authors
Mattay, V. S., Tessitore, A., Callicott, J. H., Bertolino, A., Goldberg, T. E., Chase, T. N., Hyde, T. M., & Weinberger, D. R.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01-31
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
156-164
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1996001145
Cited by
402
References
5
FWCI
16.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopaminergic modulation of cortical function in patients with Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.10078
The paper
Mattay, V. S., Tessitore, A., Callicott, J. H., Bertolino, A., Goldberg, T. E., Chase, T. N., Hyde, T. M., & Weinberger, D. R. (2002). Dopaminergic modulation of cortical function in patients with Parkinson's disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.