Cited by 104Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Will Rogers phenomenon in multiple sclerosis

Sormani, Maria Pia, Tintorè, Mar, Rovaris, Marco, Rovira, Alex, Vidal, Xavier, Bruzzi, Paolo, Filippi, Massimo, Montalban, Xavier·2008·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective Using different criteria for classifying patients into various stages of a disease can modify the stage-specific prognosis, even though the overall disease course remains unchanged. This is known as the "Will Rogers phenomenon," precluding the use of historical controls for treatment trials. We assessed whether the Will Rogers phenomenon may affect multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis when applying different diagnostic criteria. Methods Patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS were studied. After 1 year, each patient was classified as CIS or evolved to MS according to two diagnostic criteria (Poser and McDonald). The outcome for prognosis was the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale score > or = 3.0. Results 309 patients were studied for a median period of 84 months. After 1 year, 16% of patients had MS according to Poser and 44% according to McDonald criteria. The probability to reach Expanded Disability Status Scale score > or = 3.0 at median follow-up was 11% in CIS patients according to Poser and 7% according to McDonald criteria; it was 46% in MS patients according to Poser and 27% acccording to McDonald criteria. The group with a discordant diagnosis had a worse prognosis than that of CIS patients according to both criteria (p = 0.01), but better than that of MS patients according to both criteria (p = 0.01). Interpretation The use of different diagnostic criteria may generate spurious improvements in the medium-term progno…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21464

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The changes to the diagnostic criteria may be favourably shifting the apparent long-term outcome of MS (the so called 'Will Rogers phenomenon'), independent of any effect of disease-modifying treatments.

    “The changes to the diagnostic criteria may be favourably shifting the apparent long-term outcome of MS (the so called”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [72]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1056/NEJM198506203122504 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/jnci/dji248 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s00259-007-0506-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1191/1352458505ms1231oa · DOI
  5. 10.1002/ana.1025 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/ana.1032 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1002/ana.410130302 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1212/WNL.60.1.27 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
  11. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237354.10144.ec · DOI
  12. 10.1136/jnnp.57.8.897 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1056/NEJM200009283431307 · DOI
  15. 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050100044018 · DOI
  16. Noseworthy JH, 2003, Multiple sclerosis therapeutics, 319
  17. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000275545.08382.82 · DOI
  18. 10.1056/NEJMoa044397 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61194-5 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03334-0 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/ana.20363 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::AID-SIM918>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  23. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000156155.19270.F8 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sormani, M. P., Tintorè, M., Rovaris, M., Rovira, A., Vidal, X., Bruzzi, P., Filippi, M., & Montalban, X.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
Corresponding author
Filippi, Massimo
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
428-433
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2156057015
Cited by
104
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
Will Rogers phenomenon, multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome, diagnostic criteria, Poser criteria, McDonald criteria, disease progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale, prognosis, historical controls, treatment trials
MeSH terms
Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Neurologic Examination, Retrospective Studies, Disease Progression, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review