Cited by 193Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of lifestyle activities on alzheimer disease biomarkers and cognition

Open access

Abstract

Objective: A study was undertaken to investigate the association of intellectual and physical activity with biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathophysiology and cognition in a nondemented elderly population. The biomarkers evaluated were brain Aβ load via Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)‐positron emission tomography (PET), neuronal dysfunction via 18 F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)‐PET, and neurodegeneration via structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We studied 515 nondemented (428 cognitively normal and 87 mild cognitive impairment) participants in the population‐based Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who completed a 3T MRI, PET scans, and APOE genotype, and had lifestyle activity measures and cognition data available. The imaging measures computed were global PiB‐PET uptake, and global FDG‐PET and MRI based hippocampal volume. We consolidated activity variables into lifetime intellectual, current intellectual, and current physical activities. We used a global cognitive z score as a measure of cognition. We applied 2 independent methods—partial correlation analysis adjusted for age and gender and path analysis using structural equations—to evaluate the associations between lifestyle activities, imaging biomarkers, and global cognition. Results: None of the lifestyle variables were correlated with the biomarkers, and the path associations between lifestyle variables and biomarkers were not significant (p > 0.05). Conversely, all the biomarkers were correlated with global cognitive z score (p < 0.05), and the path associations between (lifetime and current) intellectual activities and global z score were significant (p < 0.01). Interpretation: Intellectual and physical activity lifestyle factors were not associated with AD biomarkers, but intellectual lifestyle factors explained variability in the cognitive performance in this nondemented population. This study provides evidence that lifestyle activities may delay the onset of dementia but do not significantly influence the expression of AD pathophysiology. ANN NEUROL 2012;72:730–738

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.23665

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1037/0882-7974.14.2.245 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–193 of 193

Metadata

Authors
Vemuri, P., Lesnick, T. G., Przybelski, S. A., Knopman, D. S., Roberts, R. O., Lowe, V. J., Kantarci, K., Senjem, M. L., Gunter, J. L., Boeve, B. F., Petersen, R. C., & Jack, C. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Vemuri, Prashanthi
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11
Volume
72
Issue
5
Pages
730-738
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1974934145
Cited by
193
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 5
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG11378, P50‐AG16574, U01AG06786, K99 AG37573, U01AG006786, K99AG037573, R01AG011378, R01AG041851, P50AG016574)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR018898)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, lifestyle habits, intellectual activity, physical activity, cognitive function, amyloid-beta, Pittsburgh compound B PET, FDG-PET, hippocampal volume, neurodegeneration, mild cognitive impairment, non-demented elderly, APOE genotype, Mayo Clinic Study of Aging
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Life Style, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Motor Activity, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Statistics as Topic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Principal Component Analysis, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review