Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amyloid‐β efflux from the central nervous system into the plasma

Roberts, Kaleigh Filisa, Elbert, Donald L., Kasten, Tom P., Patterson, Bruce W., Sigurdson, Wendy C., Connors, Rose E., Ovod, Vitaliy, Munsell, Ling Y., Mawuenyega, Kwasi G., Miller‐Thomas, Michelle M., Moran, Christopher J., Cross, Dewitte T., Derdeyn, Colin P., Bateman, Randall J.·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to measure the flux of amyloid‐β (Aβ) across the human cerebral capillary bed to determine whether transport into the blood is a significant mechanism of clearance for Aβ produced in the central nervous system (CNS). Methods: Time‐matched blood samples were simultaneously collected from a cerebral vein (including the sigmoid sinus, inferior petrosal sinus, and the internal jugular vein), femoral vein, and radial artery of patients undergoing inferior petrosal sinus sampling. For each plasma sample, Aβ concentration was assessed by 3 assays, and the venous to arterial Aβ concentration ratios were determined. Results: Aβ concentration was increased by ∼7.5% in venous blood leaving the CNS capillary bed compared to arterial blood, indicating efflux from the CNS into the peripheral blood ( p < 0.0001). There was no difference in peripheral venous Aβ concentration compared to arterial blood concentration. Interpretation: Our results are consistent with clearance of CNS‐derived Aβ into the venous blood supply with no increase from a peripheral capillary bed. Modeling these results suggests that direct transport of Aβ across the blood–brain barrier accounts for ∼25% of Aβ clearance, and reabsorption of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ accounts for ∼25% of the total CNS Aβ clearance in humans. Ann Neurol 2014;76:837–844

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24270

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1212/WNL.35.7.957 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.08.004 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02385.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2174/187152709787601867 · DOI
  5. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000306696.82017.66 · DOI
  6. 10.1001/archneur.57.1.100 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0024-3205(94)00331-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.029 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.017 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1056/NEJM199109263251301 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.02.009 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nm1438 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Okereke OI, 2009, Performance characteristics of plasma amyloid‐beta 40 and 42 assays, J Alzheimers Dis, 16, 277, 10.3233/JAD-2009-0948 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.041 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s002920050040 · DOI
  16. 10.1152/ajpheart.00658.2011 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.026 · DOI
  18. 10.1063/1.4819067 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/ajpendo.00489.2003 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004250 · DOI
  21. 10.3233/JAD-2011-111328 · DOI
  22. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256043.50901.e3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.83.4.1140 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.03.027 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01754-2 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.1067568 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1007/s11538-010-9540-5 · DOI
  28. Banks WA, 2011, Impairments in brain‐to‐blood transport of amyloid‐beta and reabsorption of cerebrospinal fluid in an animal model of Alzheimer's disease are reversed by antisense directed against amyloid‐beta protein precursor, J Alzheimers Dis, 23, 599, 10.3233/JAD-2010-100021 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s11064-010-0374-1 · DOI
  30. Bjerke M, 2010, Confounding factors influencing amyloid Beta concentration in cerebrospinal fluid, Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2010
  31. 10.1186/1743-8454-5-10 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hurley PJ, 1975, Red cell and plasma volumes in normal adults, J Nucl Med, 16, 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Roberts, K. F., Elbert, D. L., Kasten, T. P., Patterson, B. W., Sigurdson, W. C., Connors, R. E., Ovod, V., Munsell, L. Y., Mawuenyega, K. G., Miller‐Thomas, M. M., Moran, C. J., Cross, D. T., Derdeyn, C. P., & Bateman, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurology Washington University School of Medicine St Louis MO
  • Department of Biomedical Engineering Washington University in St Louis St Louis MO
  • Departments of Medicine Washington University School of Medicine St Louis MO
  • Departments of Radiology Washington University School of Medicine St Louis MO
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-10-24
Volume
76
Issue
6
Pages
837-844
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
254
References
16
Language
en
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01NS065667)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review