Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intensive evaluation of referred unclassified neuropathies yields improved diagnosis

Dyck, Peter James, Oviatt, Karen F., Lambert, Edward H.·1981·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Intensive evaluation of 205 cases of undiagnosed neuropathy in a center with special approaches and facilities permittede classification of 76% of the patients. Inherited disorders accounted for 42% of the series, 21% of the patients were shown to have inflammatory‐demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and 13% had neuropathies assocciated with other disorders. A considerable improvement in diagnosis was possible from evaluation of the kin of the patients with undiagnosed neuropathy. Analysis of the frequency and type of various sensory symptoms alos was helpful in distinguishing between acquired and inherited neuropathies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410100304

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Dyck, P. J., Oviatt, K. F., & Lambert, E. H.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
222-226
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2123209358
Cited by
324
References
0
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensive evaluation of referred unclassified neuropathies yields improved diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410100304
The paper
Dyck, P. J., Oviatt, K. F., & Lambert, E. H. (1981). Intensive evaluation of referred unclassified neuropathies yields improved diagnosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410100304

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.