Cited by 37Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and TreatmentPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

A prospective identification of neuropathic pain in specific chronic polyneuropathy syndromes and response to pharmacological therapy

Toth, Cory, Au, Shannon·2008·Pain

Abstract

Although many pharmacological agents are used in the therapy of neuropathic pain (NeP) due to polyneuropathy (PN), there are limited comparison studies comparing these agents. We evaluated patients with PN and related NeP in a tertiary care neuromuscular clinic with prospective follow-up after 3 and 6 months for degree of NeP using a Visual Analog Score (VAS). Clinical response to specific open-label pharmacotherapies was measured and compared for those patients not receiving pharmacotherapy. The severity of PN was quantified by the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS), with patients classified according to etiology of PN. Of a total of 408 patients referred for diagnosis and/or management of PN, NeP was identified in 182 patients (45%). NeP was most prevalent in patients with alcohol-associated PN. Pharmacotherapy management was provided in 91% of cases at first visit, and for 87% of cases after 6 months of follow-up. There were no serious adverse events for patients related to any medications, which included gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, cannabinoids and topical agents. Prevalence of intolerable side effects was similar amongst groups of medications. Approximated numbers needed to treat were similar between different individual oral pharmacotherapies, trending towards greater treatment efficacy with combination therapy. NeP is common in patients with PN and frequently requires pharmacotherapy management, which may be more effective with combination therapy. Future studies assessing longer duration of follow-up and quality of life changes with the use of various pharmacotherapies for management of NeP due to PN will be important.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2008.04.023

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toth, C., & Au, S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Toth, Cory
Venue
Pain
Published
2008-09-15
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
657-666
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978853809
Cited by
37
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
neuropathic pain, chronic polyneuropathy, pharmacotherapy, gabapentinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, cannabinoids, topical analgesics, combination therapy, Toronto Clinical Scoring System, visual analogue scale, treatment response, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Aged, Analgesics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Polyneuropathies, Prospective Studies, Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review