Cited by 950Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury in humans: An analysis of 45 cases

Adams, J. Hume, Graham, D. I., Murray, Lilian S., Scott, Grace·1982·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Forty-five cases of diffuse axonal injury (DAI) brought about by nonmissile head injury in humans are analyzed and compared with 132 cases of fatal head injury without DAI. All cases were subjected to a comprehensive neuropathological study. In the patients with DAI a statistically significant lower incidence of lucid interval, fracture of the skull, cerebral contusions, intracranial hematoma, and evidence of high intracranial pressure were found, with a higher incidence of head injury due to road traffic accident. Brain swelling and hypoxic brain damage were not statistically different in the two groups. The features of DAI in humans are compared with the DAI that has been produced in subhuman primates by pure inertial loading brought about by angular acceleration of the head. The available evidence indicates that DAI in human beings occurs at the time of head injury and is not due to complicating factors such as hypoxia, brain swelling, or raised intracranial pressure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410120610

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have shown that the greatest brainstem damage with TBI is often near the dorsolateral surface of the mesopontine junction.

    “the observed pattern of injury is in keeping with other studies which have shown the greatest brainstem damage with TBI is often near the dorsolateral surface of the mesopontine junction, 12,13”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, J. H., Graham, D. I., Murray, L. S., & Scott, G.
Affiliations
Southern General Hospital (GB)
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-12
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
557-563
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2030312267
Cited by
950
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 32
FWCI
10.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
diffuse axonal injury, traumatic brain injury, traffic accidents, lucid interval, cerebral contusion, intracranial hematoma, skull fracture, intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, hypoxic brain injury, inertial loads, angular acceleration, subhuman primates, neuropathology
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Axons, Brain, Brain Concussion, Brain Edema, Brain Injuries, Hypoxia, Brain, Child, Female, Hematoma, Humans, Intracranial Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Skull Fractures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review