Cited by 254Automotive and Human Injury BiomechanicsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Biomechanical Analysis of Experimental Diffuse Axonal Injury

MEANEY, DAVID F., SMITH, DOUGLAS H., SHREIBER, DAVID I., BAIN, ALLISON C., MILLER, REID T., ROSS, DOUG T., GENNARELLI, THOMAS A.·1995·Journal of Neurotrauma

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present results from methodologies used in our laboratory that are targeted toward identifying specific brain injury thresholds. Results from studying one form of brain injury, diffuse axonal injury, are presented in this report. Physical models, or surrogates, of the skull-brain complex are used to estimate the relationship between inertial loading and brain deformation. A porcine model of diffuse axonal injury, developed with information from these physical models and earlier in vitro tissue modeling studies, is used to correlate histologic and radiologic evidence of axonal injury to predicted regions of injury from the experimental and theoretical analysis. These results form the basis for developing improved diffuse brain injury tolerance levels, as well as identifying new means of diagnostic and treatment techniques for diffuse axonal injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/neu.1995.12.689

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concussion and subconcussion are produced by acceleration and deceleration forces on the brain, either linear or rotational.

    “Concussion and subconcussion are produced by acceleration and deceleration forces on the brain, either linear or rotational [130].”

    From The neuropathology of sport (2014) · cites this paper as [130]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MEANEY, D. F., SMITH, D. H., SHREIBER, D. I., BAIN, A. C., MILLER, R. T., ROSS, D. T., & GENNARELLI, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurotrauma
Published
1995-08
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
689-694
ISSN
  • 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9042
OpenAlex
W1991799458
Cited by
254
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R49 CCR 304684)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-08803)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
diffuse axonal injury, inertial loads, brain deformation, porcine model, traumatic brain injury
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Injuries, Models, Neurological, Swine, Swine, Miniature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review