The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Serial gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans in patients with early, relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: Implications for clinical trials and natural history
Abstract
Six patients with early, mild, relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis were studied with monthly gadolinium‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans for 8 to 11 months. Numerous enhancing lesions were observed irrespective of clinical activity. Four of the 6 patients had one or more enhancing lesions present on each examination. The other 2 patients had enhancing lesions noted in 7 and 9 of 11 months. In contrast, only two clinical exacerbations were observed during the study period. Neither the exacerbations nor other changes in symptoms or signs correlated with occurrence of the enhancing lesions. Enhancement generally persisted for less than 1 month. The opening of the blood‐brain barrier as reflected by gadolinium enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging may represent ongoing disease activity in patients with mild, relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis who are clinically stable. The frequency of these lesions appears to be sufficient to use as an outcome measure in clinical trials testing clinical efficacy in patients with early, relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Cited by
Reich, D. S., Lucchinetti, C. F., & Calabresi, P. A. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1401483 · Cited by 2,491
An updated histological classification system for multiple sclerosis lesions
Kuhlmann, T., Ludwin, S., Prat, A., Antel, J., Brück, W., & Lassmann, H. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1653-y · Cited by 692
Miller, D. H., Albert, P. S., Barkhof, F., Francis, G., Frank, J. A., Hodgkinson, S., Lublin, F. D., Paty, D. W., Reingold, S. C., & Simon, J. (1996) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410390104 · Cited by 444
Self-citationKatz, D., Taubenberger, J. K., Cannella, B., McFarlin, D. E., Raine, C. S., & McFarland, H. F. (1993) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410340507 · Cited by 387
Self-citationImmunological aspects of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis
Martin, R., McFarland, H. F., & Boggs, J. M. (1995) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.3109/10408369509084683 · Cited by 376
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, J. O., Frank, J. A., Patronas, N., McFarlin, D. E., & McFarland, H. F.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 548-555
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2075933266
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
