The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic resonance image–based hippocampal volumentry: Correlation with outcome after temporal lobectomy
Abstract
We developed a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based technique for measuring the volume of the hippocampal formation. In this study, the relationship between volumes of the hippocampal formation and outcome (i.e., postoperative seizure control) after anterior temporal lobectomy for intractable epilepsy was analyzed in 50 consecutive patients in whom the surgical specimen did not contain an epileptogenic mass lesion. Outcome was classified as either satisfactory or unsatisfactory. A significant relationship was found between outcome and volume of the operated of hippocampal formation (p = 0.012), as well as a derived volumetric measure (nonoperated minus operated volume of the hippocampal formation) (p = 0.004). The association between outcome and nonoperated volume was borderline (p = 0.057). Thirty‐four (97%) of 35 patients in whom the volumetric study and electroencephalography (EEG) concordantly lateralized the seizure disorder had satisfactory postoperative seizure control. Conversely, only 7 (42%) of 12 patients in whom the volume study was nonlateralizing and 1 (33%) of 3 in whom the EEG and volume study were discordant had a satisfactory outcome. We regard our MRI‐based study of hippocampal formation volume as a noninvasive surrogate for the identification of moderate or severe mesial temporal sclerosis. The technique is a useful adjunct in a multidisciplinary, preoperative epilepsy evaluation when T2‐weighted MRIs do not reveal an epileptogenic mass lesion. The reasons for the usefulness of this imaging technique are: (1) It is an independent source of information on seizure lateralization, (2) it will provide information as to expected postoperative outcome, and (3) it may aid in appropriately selecting patients for invasive preoperative monitoring studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jack, C. R., Twomey, C. K., Zinsmeister, A. R., Sharbrough, F. W., Petersen, R. C., & Cascino, G. D. (1989) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.172.2.2748838 · Cited by 592
Self-citation
Cited by
Face processing occurs outside the fusiform ‘face area’ in autism: evidence from functional MRI
Pierce, K. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.10.2059 · Cited by 898
MR-based in vivo hippocampal volumetrics: 2. Findings in neuropsychiatric disorders
Geuze, E., Vermetten, E., & Bremner, J. D. (2005) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001579 · Cited by 412
MRI‐Based Hippocampal Volume Measurements in Epilepsy
Jack, C. R. (1994) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb05986.x · Cited by 224
Self-citationCavus, I., Pan, J. W., Hetherington, H. P., Abi‐Saab, W., Zaveri, H. P., Vives, K. P., Krystal, J. H., Spencer, S. S., & Spencer, D. D. (2008) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01603.x · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Jack, C. R., Sharbrough, F. W., Cascino, G. D., Hirschorn, K. A., O'Brien, P. C., & Marsh, W. R.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 138-146
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2080211545
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic resonance image–based hippocampal volumentry: Correlation with outcome after temporal lobectomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410310204
- The paper
- Jack, C. R., Sharbrough, F. W., Cascino, G. D., Hirschorn, K. A., O'Brien, P. C., & Marsh, W. R. (1992). Magnetic resonance image–based hippocampal volumentry: Correlation with outcome after temporal lobectomy. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410310204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.