The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low‐dose (7.5 mg) oral methotrexate reduces the rate of progression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis
Abstract
A randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled, clinical trial of low‐dose, weekly, oral methotrexate was performed in 60 patients with clinically definite chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) attending a referral‐based outpatient MS clinic. Study patients were 21 to 60 years old with a disease duration of longer than 1 year. Patients' Expanded Disability Status Scale scores were 3.0 to 6.5 (ambulatory with moderate disability). Patients were first stratified by Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, 3.0 to 5.5 and 6.0 to 6.5, and then were randomized to receive methotrexate or placebo treatment. Treatment consisted of weekly, oral, low‐dose (7.5 mg) methotrexate or identical placebo for 2 years, followed by observation for as long as 1 year. A composite outcome measurement instrument was used and consisted of (1) Expanded Disability Status Scale, (2) ambulation index, (3) Box and Block Test, and (4) 9‐Hole Peg Test. Failure of therapy was indicated by a designated change that was sustained for more than 2 months in one or more components of this composite measure. Significantly less progression of impairment as measured by validated tests of upper‐extremity function was observed in the methotrexate treatment group in the absence of clinically significant toxicity. We conclude that low‐dose, weekly, oral methotrexate offers a new, relatively nontoxic treatment option for patients with chronic progressive MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Asymptotically Efficient Rank Invariant Test Procedures
Peto, R., & Peto, J. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344317 · Cited by 3,393
Cited by
Primary-progressive multiple sclerosis
Miller, D. H., & Leary, S. M. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70243-0 · Cited by 818
The optimal controller delay for myoelectric prostheses
Farrell, T. R., & Weir, R. F. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.891391 · Cited by 438
Hohol, M. J., Orav, E. J., & Weiner, H. L. (1999) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/135245859900500508 · Cited by 369
Koźmiński, P., Halik, P. K., Chesori, R., & Gniazdowska, E. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21103483 · Cited by 326
Diagnosis and Management of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Macaron, G., & Ontaneda, D. (2019) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines7030056 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodkin, D. E., Rudick, R. A., Medendorp, S. V., Daughtry, M. M., Schwetz, K. M., Fischer, J., & van Dyke, C.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30-40
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2167365151
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐dose (7.5 mg) oral methotrexate reduces the rate of progression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410370108
- The paper
- Goodkin, D. E., Rudick, R. A., Medendorp, S. V., Daughtry, M. M., Schwetz, K. M., Fischer, J., & van Dyke, C. (1995). Low‐dose (7.5 mg) oral methotrexate reduces the rate of progression in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410370108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.