Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of deprenyl and levodopa on the progression of Parkinson's disease

Olanow, C. W., Hauser, R. A., Gauguster, L., Malapira, T., Koller, W., Hubble, J., Bushenbark, K., Lilienfeld, D., Esterlitz, J.·1995·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

We have performed a 14‐month, prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate the effect of deprenyl and levodopa/carbidopa (Sinemet) on the progression of signs and symptoms in patients with mild Parkinson's disease (PD). One hundred one untreated PD patients were randomly assigned to one of the following four treatment groups: Group I, deprenyl + Sinemet; Group II, placebo‐deprenyl + Sinemet; Group III, deprenyl + bromocriptine; and Group IV, placebo‐deprenyl + bromocriptine. The final visit was performed at 14 months, i.e., 2 months after withdrawal of deprenyl or its placebo and 7 days after withdrawal of Sinemet or bromocriptine. Deterioration in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Score (UPDRS) between untreated baseline and final visits was used as an index of disease progression. Placebo‐treated patients deteriorated by 5.8 ± 1.4 points, while deprenyl‐treated patients deteriorated by 0.4 ± 1.3 points (p < 0.001). This effect was sufficiently powerful that a significant deprenyl effect could be detected in the subgroup of 41 patients randomized to Sinemet (p < 0.01) as well as in the 23 patients who completed a 14‐day washout of Sinemet or bromocriptine (p < 0.05). No difference in the extent of deterioration was detected in patients randomized to Sinemet versus bromocriptine. This study demonstrates that deprenyl attenuates deterioration in UPDRS score in patients with early PD. These findings are not readily explained by the drug's symptomatic effects and are consistent with the hypothesis that deprenyl has a neuroprotective effect.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410380512

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Olanow, C. W., Hauser, R. A., Gauguster, L., Malapira, T., Koller, W., Hubble, J., Bushenbark, K., Lilienfeld, D., & Esterlitz, J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-11
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
771-777
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2046712196
Cited by
334
References
4
FWCI
15.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of deprenyl and levodopa on the progression of Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410380512
The paper
Olanow, C. W., Hauser, R. A., Gauguster, L., Malapira, T., Koller, W., Hubble, J., Bushenbark, K., Lilienfeld, D., & Esterlitz, J. (1995). The effect of deprenyl and levodopa on the progression of Parkinson's disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380512

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.