The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis
Abstract
This article represents initial deliberation of an international task force appointed by the US National Multiple Sclerosis Society to develop recommendations for optimal clinical assessment tools for multiple sclerosis clinical trials. Presented within this article are the key issues identified by the task force during its initial year of deliberation. These include the precise purpose for a clinical assessment tool, the clinical dimensions to be measured in a multidimensional outcome measure, desirable attributes of an optimal clinical outcome measure, the complexities of multidimensional outcome measures, the relative merits of categorical clinical ratings and quantitative functional assessments, and a number of other important design issues that relate to the use of a multidimensional outcome measure. An action plan for analysis of existing data is summarized, as are the plans for more detailed recommendations from the task force.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach
Stewart, A., & Ware, J. (1992) · doi:10.7249/cb361 · Cited by 2,689
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401
Cited by
Heesen, C., Böhm, J., Reich, C., Kasper, J., Goebel, M., & Gold, S. (2008) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458508088916 · Cited by 521
Hohol, M. J., Orav, E. J., & Weiner, H. L. (1999) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/135245859900500508 · Cited by 369
The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS): a new disability measure for multiple sclerosis
Sharrack, B., & Hughes, R. A. (1999) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/135245859900500406 · Cited by 293
Neuropsychological Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis
Brassington, J. C., & Marsh, N. V. (1998) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1025621700003 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Rudick, R., Fischer, J., Antel, J., Confavreux, C., Cutter, G., Ellison, G., Lublin, F., Miller, A., Petkau, J., Rao, S., Reingold, S., Syndulko, K., Thompson, A., Wallenberg, J., Weinshenker, B., & Willoughby, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 469-479
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2080896710
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410400321
- The paper
- Rudick, R., Fischer, J., Antel, J., Confavreux, C., Cutter, G., Ellison, G., Lublin, F., Miller, A., Petkau, J., Rao, S., Reingold, S., Syndulko, K., Thompson, A., Wallenberg, J., Weinshenker, B., & Willoughby, E. (1996). Clinical outcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400321
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.