CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles for Dynamic Imaging and Therapy

Ko, Min Jun, Hong, Hyunsik, Choi, Hyunjun, Kang, Heemin, Kim, Dong‐Hyun·2022·Advanced NanoBiomed Research
DOI 10.1002/anbr.202200053
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) exhibit unique properties, such as remote motion controllability, degradability, and diagnostic imaging, which are typically not shown in nonmagnetic nanomaterials. MNPs remotely controllable via magnetic fields offer advantages of high tissue penetrability and biocompatibility. In this review, recent advances of multifunctional MNPs exhibiting unique characteristic for therapeutic applications are summarized, which utilize the “dynamic” motion, iron ion degradation, or imaging‐guided targeting of the MNPs under diverse magnetic field modes. The magnetic field‐controlled MNP motion enables spatiotemporal and reversible in situ cell regulation and mechanosensitive molecule modulation or thermal energy generation. Furthermore, the iron‐based MNPs can produce degraded ions and reactive oxygen species to enable targeted ferroptosis therapy with medical imaging‐guided approaches. The state‐of‐the‐art imaging‐guided “dynamic” therapy using the MNPs that can provide in situ feedback at each therapeutic stage is highlighted. Potential hurdles in translating the magnetic dynamic imaging and therapy toward clinical practices are also discussed. The imaging capability of the MNPs during “dynamic” magneto‐cell regulation enables noninvasive, safe, localized, and on‐demand regulation for the state‐of‐the‐art regenerative therapy, immunotherapy, and cancer treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anbr.202200053

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Multifunctional MNPs using external magnetic fields and their applications toward dynamic imaging and therapy.
Figure 1 Multifunctional MNPs using external magnetic fields and their applications toward dynamic imaging and therapy.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Magnetothermal cell regulation. a) Heat dissipation by the MNPs under AMF. b) Schematic diagram of mild magnetic hyperthermia versus conventional magnetic hyperthermia therapy. c) Mild magnetic hyperthermia kills cancer cells by activating NK cells via downregulation of HSP 70. d) Chemoactivation of neurons using magnetothermal stimulation. Release of drugs (CNO þ ) from magnetic liposomes can be controlled in response to AMF, leading to neuron stimulation. (c) Reproduced with permission. [77] Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (d) Reproduced with permission. [80] Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.
Figure 4 Magnetothermal cell regulation. a) Heat dissipation by the MNPs under AMF. b) Schematic diagram of mild magnetic hyperthermia versus conventional magnetic hyperthermia therapy. c) Mild magnetic hyperthermia kills cancer cells by activating NK cells via downregulation of HSP 70. d) Chemoactivation of neurons using magnetothermal stimulation. Release of drugs (CNO þ ) from magnetic liposomes can be controlled in response to AMF, leading to neuron stimulation. (c) Reproduced with permission. [77] Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society. (d) Reproduced with permission. [80] Copyright 2019, Springer Nature.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 MNPsfor ferroptosis induction. a) Enhanced ferroptosis by local delivery of Fenton reactants (Fe 2 þ , Fe 3 þ , and H2O2). b) Temporal regulation of ferroptosis-like cell death using magnetic field. Released ascorbic acid (AA) reduces ferric ions to ferrous ions, leading to enhanced ROS generation. c) Ferroptosis-enhanced cancer immunotherapy using platelet membrane-camouflaged MNPs. d) Renal clearable ultrasmall nanoparticle induce ferroptotic cell death and trigger ICD. (a) Reproduced with permission. [82] Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (b) Reproduced with permission. [51] Copyright 2020, Springer Nature. (c) Reproduced with permission. [164] Copyright 2020, John Wiley & Sons. (d) Reproduced with permission. [165] Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.
Figure 5 MNPsfor ferroptosis induction. a) Enhanced ferroptosis by local delivery of Fenton reactants (Fe 2 þ , Fe 3 þ , and H2O2). b) Temporal regulation of ferroptosis-like cell death using magnetic field. Released ascorbic acid (AA) reduces ferric ions to ferrous ions, leading to enhanced ROS generation. c) Ferroptosis-enhanced cancer immunotherapy using platelet membrane-camouflaged MNPs. d) Renal clearable ultrasmall nanoparticle induce ferroptotic cell death and trigger ICD. (a) Reproduced with permission. [82] Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society. (b) Reproduced with permission. [51] Copyright 2020, Springer Nature. (c) Reproduced with permission. [164] Copyright 2020, John Wiley & Sons. (d) Reproduced with permission. [165] Copyright 2021, American Chemical Society.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 MRI guidance using multifunctional MNPs. a) A schematic representation of advantages of MRI for therapy using functional MNPs or activated cells by magnetic stimulation. b) Regions of interest around lymph nodes in MR images for precise calculation of volume of lymph nodes. Prediction of therapeutic outcomes by activated DC migration on lymph nodes quantified by MR images and the correlation between prediction and actual tumor response and survival. c) MRI tracking of MNP-labeled cytotoxic T cells accumulated in the tumor region by application of external magnetic field. d) MR contrast effect of synthesized MNPs and the comparison of R 2 relaxivity for finding the strongest T 2 MR contrast agent. e) A comparative study for the demonstration of enhanced intratumoral distribution of IOs-CREKA using T 2-weighted MR images. (b) Reproduced with permission. [74] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (c) Reproduced with permission. [179] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (d -e) Reproduced with permission. [180] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.
Figure 6 MRI guidance using multifunctional MNPs. a) A schematic representation of advantages of MRI for therapy using functional MNPs or activated cells by magnetic stimulation. b) Regions of interest around lymph nodes in MR images for precise calculation of volume of lymph nodes. Prediction of therapeutic outcomes by activated DC migration on lymph nodes quantified by MR images and the correlation between prediction and actual tumor response and survival. c) MRI tracking of MNP-labeled cytotoxic T cells accumulated in the tumor region by application of external magnetic field. d) MR contrast effect of synthesized MNPs and the comparison of R 2 relaxivity for finding the strongest T 2 MR contrast agent. e) A comparative study for the demonstration of enhanced intratumoral distribution of IOs-CREKA using T 2-weighted MR images. (b) Reproduced with permission. [74] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (c) Reproduced with permission. [179] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (d -e) Reproduced with permission. [180] Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society.CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 220

  1. Banghart M., 2004, Nat. Neurosci., 7, 1381, 10.1038/nn1356 · DOI
  2. Kim D.-H., 2010, Nat. Mater., 9, 165, 10.1038/nmat2591 · DOI
  3. Wu C.-Y., 2015, Science, 350, aab4077, 10.1126/science.aab4077 · DOI
  4. Park H.-J., 2022, Nanomaterials, 12, 1377, 10.3390/nano12081377 · DOI
  5. Yu L., 2022, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 11326, 10.1021/jacs.2c03256 · DOI
  6. Xie J., 2021, Chem. Soc. Rev., 50, 9152, 10.1039/D0CS01370F · DOI
  7. Mickle A. D., 2019, Nature, 565, 361, 10.1038/s41586-018-0823-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dobson J., 2008, Nat. Nanotechnol., 3, 139, 10.1038/nnano.2008.39 · DOI
  9. Park B. C., 2020, Nat. Commun., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zhao Y., 2021, Exploration, 1, 20210089, 10.1002/EXP.20210089 · DOI
  11. Yang H. Y., 2021, Adv. NanoBiomed Res., 1, 2000043, 10.1002/anbr.202000043 · DOI
  12. Golovin Y. I., 2015, J. Controlled Release, 219, 43, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.038 · DOI
  13. Moon J., 2020, Adv. Funct. Mater., 30, 2000577, 10.1002/adfm.202000577 · DOI
  14. Xue W., 2018, J. Mater. Chem. B, 6, 2289, 10.1039/C7TB03206D · DOI
  15. Park J. S., 2017, Adv. Funct. Mater., 27, 1700396, 10.1002/adfm.201700396 · DOI
  16. Xia X., 2021, Exploration, 1, 9, 10.1002/EXP.20210002 · DOI
  17. Kang H., 2017, Biomaterials, 149, 12, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.09.035 · DOI
  18. Chang D., 2018, Front. Pharmacol., 9, 831, 10.3389/fphar.2018.00831 · DOI
  19. Wydra R. J., 2015, Acta Biomater., 25, 284, 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.037 · DOI
  20. Zhu Y., 2022, Adv. Mater., 34, 2108389, 10.1002/adma.202108389 · DOI
  21. Züger F., 2022, Adv. NanoBiomed Res., 2, 2100108, 10.1002/anbr.202100108 · DOI
  22. Kim Y., 2020, View, 1, 20200029, 10.1002/VIW.20200029 · DOI
  23. Khatua C., 2020, Nano Lett., 20, 4188, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00559 · DOI
  24. Liu J., 2020, Science, 367, 1372, 10.1126/science.aay4866 · DOI
  25. Kang H., 2018, Adv. Mater., 30, 1803591, 10.1002/adma.201803591 · DOI
  26. Stupp S. I., 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 1906741, 10.1002/adma.201906741 · DOI
  27. Kang H., 2019, Nat. Commun., 10, 1696, 10.1038/s41467-019-09733-6 · DOI
  28. Kim D., 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 1906989, 10.1002/adma.201906989 · DOI
  29. Kang H. M., 2018, Adv. Funct. Mater., 28, 1802642, 10.1002/adfm.201802642 · DOI
  30. Li W., 2018, Chem. Soc. Rev., 47, 8639, 10.1039/C8CS00053K · DOI
  31. Luo H., 2021, Adv. Funct. Mater., 31, 2101262, 10.1002/adfm.202101262 · DOI
  32. Kang H., 2018, Biomaterials, 178, 681, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.007 · DOI
  33. Wu C. Y., 2018, Adv. Mater., 30, 1705673, 10.1002/adma.201705673 · DOI
  34. Armstrong J. P. K., 2020, Trends Biotechnol., 38, 254, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.07.005 · DOI
  35. Gaharwar A. K., 2020, Nat. Rev. Mater., 5, 686, 10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x · DOI
  36. Dabbagh S. R., 2022, Adv. NanoBiomed Res., 2, 2100103, 10.1002/anbr.202100103 · DOI
  37. Kim Y., 2022, Chem. Rev., 122, 5317, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00481 · DOI
  38. Gu H., 2020, Nat. Commun., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Gossuin Y., 2009, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol., 1, 299, 10.1002/wnan.36 · DOI
  40. Yang L., 2022, Small, 18, 2104783, 10.1002/smll.202104783 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Zwi-Dantsis L., 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 1904598, 10.1002/adma.201904598 · DOI
  42. Ganesan V., 2019, J. Mol. Liq., 281, 315, 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.02.095 · DOI
  43. De Châtel P., 2009, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 21, 124202, 10.1088/0953-8984/21/12/124202 · DOI
  44. Yang S. H., 2022, Nano-Micro Lett., 14, 1, 10.1007/s40820-021-00751-y · DOI
  45. Lisjak D., 2018, Prog. Mater Sci., 95, 286, 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2018.03.003 · DOI
  46. Dennis C. L., 2013, Int. J. Hyperther., 29, 715, 10.3109/02656736.2013.836758 · DOI
  47. Hildebrandt B., 2002, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol., 43, 33, 10.1016/S1040-8428(01)00179-2 · DOI
  48. Liu X., 2020, Theranostics, 10, 3793, 10.7150/thno.40805 · DOI
  49. Kang H., 2017, ACS Nano, 11, 9636, 10.1021/acsnano.7b02857 · DOI
  50. Yu B., 2020, Nat. Commun., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Shen Z., 2018, Adv. Mater., 30, 1704007, 10.1002/adma.201704007 · DOI
  52. Jiang X., 2021, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 22, 266, 10.1038/s41580-020-00324-8 · DOI
  53. Liang C., 2019, Adv. Mater., 31, 1904197, 10.1002/adma.201904197 · DOI
  54. Chen Q., 2021, Nanoscale, 13, 4855, 10.1039/D0NR08757B · DOI
  55. Wang X., 2020, Nano Today, 35, 100946, 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100946 · DOI
  56. Wu H., 2021, Theranostics, 11, 64, 10.7150/thno.46124 · DOI
  57. Kwak K., 2022, Theranostics, 12, 2175, 10.7150/thno.67530 · DOI
  58. Hembury M., 2015, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 1959, 10.1073/pnas.1419622112 · DOI
  59. Kim D.-H., 2018, J. Imaging, 4, 18, 10.3390/jimaging4010018 · DOI
  60. Perez J. M., 2002, Nat. Biotechnol., 20, 816, 10.1038/nbt720 · DOI
  61. Wang Q., 2021, Exploration, 1, 20210009, 10.1002/EXP.20210009 · DOI
  62. Josephson L., 2001, Angew. Chem., 113, 3304, 10.1002/1521-3757(20010903)113:17<3304::AID-ANGE3304>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  63. Shasha C., 2021, Adv. Mater., 33, 1904131, 10.1002/adma.201904131 · DOI
  64. Hong H., 2021, Adv. Mater., 34, 2105460, 10.1002/adma.202105460 · DOI
  65. Min S., 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 2004300, 10.1002/adma.202004300 · DOI
  66. Min S., 2021, Adv. Mater., 33, 2008353, 10.1002/adma.202008353 · DOI
  67. Lopez S., 2022, Nanoscale Adv., 4, 421, 10.1039/D1NA00474C · DOI
  68. Park W., 2021, Biomater. Sci., 9, 5497, 10.1039/D1BM00419K · DOI
  69. Chen M., 2020, Small, 16, 1905424, 10.1002/smll.201905424 · DOI
  70. Gregurec D., 2020, ACS Nano, 14, 8036, 10.1021/acsnano.0c00562 · DOI
  71. Sim T., 2021, ACS Nano, 15, 12780, 10.1021/acsnano.1c01889 · DOI
  72. Grippin A. J., 2019, ACS Nano, 13, 13884, 10.1021/acsnano.9b05037 · DOI
  73. Lee J.-U., 2021, Nat. Mater., 20, 1029, 10.1038/s41563-020-00896-y · DOI
  74. Jang J. T., 2018, Adv. Mater., 30, 1704362, 10.1002/adma.201704362 · DOI
  75. Pan J., 2021, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 143, 8116, 10.1021/jacs.1c02537 · DOI
  76. Balakrishnan P. B., 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 2003712, 10.1002/adma.202003712 · DOI
  77. Chen R., 2015, Science, 347, 1477, 10.1126/science.1261821 · DOI
  78. Rao S., 2019, Nat. Nanotechnol., 14, 967, 10.1038/s41565-019-0521-z · DOI
  79. Liu X., 2020, ACS Nano, 14, 1936, 10.1021/acsnano.9b08320 · DOI
  80. Shen Z., 2018, ACS Nano, 12, 11355, 10.1021/acsnano.8b06201 · DOI
  81. Hu Y., 2018, Chem. Soc. Rev., 47, 1874, 10.1039/C7CS00657H · DOI
  82. Huang H.-W., 2019, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau1532, 10.1126/sciadv.aau1532 · DOI
  83. Huang H.-W., 2016, Nat. Commun., 7, 1
  84. Zhang M., 2021, Biomaterials, 268, 120543, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120543 · DOI
  85. Rödling L., 2018, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 7, 1701403, 10.1002/adhm.201701403 · DOI
  86. Islam M. S., 2021, Adv. NanoBiomed Res., 1, 2000072, 10.1002/anbr.202000072 · DOI
  87. Li C., 2021, Adv. NanoBiomed Res., 1, 2000081, 10.1002/anbr.202000081 · DOI
  88. Du V., 2017, Nat. Commun., 8, 400, 10.1038/s41467-017-00543-2 · DOI
  89. Kang H., 2014, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2, 5676, 10.1039/C4TB00714J · DOI
  90. Zhang T., 2019, Adv. Funct. Mater., 29, 1900603, 10.1002/adfm.201900603 · DOI
  91. Zhou D. W., 2021, Nat. Commun., 12, 1, 10.1038/s41467-020-20314-w · DOI · Paper page
  92. Wong D. S. H., 2017, Nano Lett., 17, 1685, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04958 · DOI
  93. Lee S., 2021, Small, 17, 2102892, 10.1002/smll.202102892 · DOI
  94. Cui T., 2022, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 61, 202113103, 10.1002/anie.202113103 · DOI
  95. Li C. C., 2018, Biomaterials, 176, 24, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.05.029 · DOI
  96. Bae G., 2022, Adv. Funct. Mater., 32, 2200828, 10.1002/adfm.202200828 · DOI
  97. Yan X., 2017, Sci. Rob., 2, eaaq1155, 10.1126/scirobotics.aaq1155 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Cho S., 2019, Adv. Funct. Mater., 29, 1901384, 10.1002/adfm.201901384 · DOI
  99. Thangam R., 2021, Adv. Funct. Mater., 31, 2001446
  100. Kang H., 2018, Acs Nano, 12, 5978, 10.1021/acsnano.8b02226 · DOI
  101. Wu D., 2022, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 14, 12976, 10.1021/acsami.1c22603 · DOI
  102. Zhu Y., 2012, Aging Cell, 11, 741, 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00840.x · DOI
  103. Zhang L., 2020, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12, 52467, 10.1021/acsami.0c17213 · DOI
  104. Kang H., 2017, Nano Lett., 17, 6415, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03405 · DOI
  105. Kim Y., 2022, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 5769, 10.1021/jacs.1c08861 · DOI
  106. Wong S. H. D., 2020, Nano Lett., 20, 3207, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05315 · DOI
  107. Kim J. W., 2018, Acc. Chem. Res, 51, 839, 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00004 · DOI
  108. Coste B., 2010, Science, 330, 55, 10.1126/science.1193270 · DOI · Paper page
  109. Shimasaki N., 2020, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery, 19, 200, 10.1038/s41573-019-0052-1 · DOI
  110. Wheeler M. A., 2016, Nat. Neurosci., 19, 756, 10.1038/nn.4265 · DOI
  111. Xu F.-X., 2020, Nat. Neurosci., 23, 1041, 10.1038/s41593-019-0475-3 · DOI
  112. Shin T.-H., 2017, Acc. Chem. Res., 50, 567, 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00559 · DOI
  113. Müller D. J., 2009, Nat. Chem. Biol., 5, 383, 10.1038/nchembio.181 · DOI
  114. Gu Z., 2019, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 141, 6122, 10.1021/jacs.8b10904 · DOI
  115. Thangam R., 2021, Vaccines, 9, 935, 10.3390/vaccines9080935 · DOI
  116. Tadijan A., 2021, Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 9, 3482, 10.3389/fcell.2021.786758 · DOI
  117. Kim D.-H., 2009, IEEE Trans. Magn., 45, 4821, 10.1109/TMAG.2009.2024000 · DOI
  118. Boyden E. S., 2005, Nat. Neurosci., 8, 1263, 10.1038/nn1525 · DOI
  119. Yu Y., 2021, Adv. Sci., 9, 2104194, 10.1002/advs.202104194 · DOI
  120. Jin Y., 2019, Nano Lett., 19, 6517, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b02756 · DOI
  121. Katz B., 1967, J. Physiol., 192, 407, 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008307 · DOI
  122. Wen C., 2016, Drug Delivery Trans. Res., 6, 121, 10.1007/s13346-015-0242-2 · DOI
  123. Sadtler K., 2016, Nat. Rev. Mater., 1, 16040, 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.40 · DOI
  124. Rao V., 2015, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 3, 1
  125. Bae G., 2021, Adv. Funct. Mater., 31, 2001446
  126. Zuo S., 2021, Theranostics, 11, 7471, 10.7150/thno.59953 · DOI
  127. Xu J., 2020, Adv. Sci., 7, 1903394, 10.1002/advs.201903394 · DOI
  128. Cheng H. W., 2021, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 10, 2001451, 10.1002/adhm.202001451 · DOI
  129. Kim Y., 2022, Adv. Mater., 34, 2110340, 10.1002/adma.202110340 · DOI
  130. Min S., 2020, Nano Lett., 20, 7272, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02655 · DOI
  131. Kim D.-H., 2008, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 320, 2390, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.05.023 · DOI
  132. Kim D.-H., 2010, Materials, 3, 4051, 10.3390/ma3074051 · DOI
  133. Ramos-Sebastian A., 2022, Adv. Sci., 9, 2103863, 10.1002/advs.202103863 · DOI
  134. Kang H., 2018, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 140, 5909, 10.1021/jacs.8b03001 · DOI
  135. Gavilán H., 2021, Chem. Soc. Rev., 50, 11614, 10.1039/D1CS00427A · DOI
  136. Périgo E. A., 2015, Appl. Phys. Rev., 2, 041302, 10.1063/1.4935688 · DOI
  137. Cabrera D., 2018, ACS Nano, 12, 2741, 10.1021/acsnano.7b08995 · DOI
  138. Jordan A., 1999, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 201, 413, 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00088-8 · DOI
  139. Hergt R., 2007, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 311, 187, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1156 · DOI
  140. Mo A. H., 2016, Nanoscale, 8, 11840, 10.1039/C6NR02445A · DOI
  141. Nemati Z., 2018, J. Phys. Chem. C, 122, 2367, 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10528 · DOI
  142. Di Corato R., 2014, Biomaterials, 35, 6400, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.036 · DOI
  143. Jeon S., 2020, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 12, 33483, 10.1021/acsami.0c07419 · DOI
  144. Mamiya H., 2020, ACS Nano, 14, 8421, 10.1021/acsnano.0c02521 · DOI
  145. Zyuzin M. V., 2019, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 41957, 10.1021/acsami.9b15501 · DOI
  146. Sanz B., 2016, Sci. Rep., 6, 1, 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  147. Wilhelm S., 2016, Nat. Rev. Mater., 1, 1
  148. Han X., 2019, Biomaterials, 224, 119490, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119490 · DOI
  149. Spirou S. V., 2018, Nanomaterials, 8, 401, 10.3390/nano8060401 · DOI
  150. Mai B. T., 2019, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 11, 5727, 10.1021/acsami.8b16226 · DOI
  151. Chang M., 2021, Adv. Mater., 33, 2004788, 10.1002/adma.202004788 · DOI
  152. Moros M., 2019, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev., 138, 326, 10.1016/j.addr.2018.10.004 · DOI
  153. Liu X., 2019, ACS Nano, 13, 8811, 10.1021/acsnano.9b01979 · DOI
  154. Kang H., 2019, Nano Lett., 19, 1963, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05150 · DOI
  155. Choi H., 2020, Adv. Funct. Mater., 30, 2001446, 10.1002/adfm.202001446 · DOI
  156. Wang L., 2022, Nano Today, 43, 101401, 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101401 · DOI
  157. Kang H., 2015, Appl. Clay Sci., 112, 32, 10.1016/j.clay.2015.04.015 · DOI
  158. Manohar A., 2021, J. Alloys Compd., 874, 159868, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159868 · DOI
  159. Tang G., 2021, Exploration, 1, 75, 10.1002/EXP.20210005 · DOI
  160. Metelitsa D. I., 1971, Russ. Chem. Rev., 40, 563, 10.1070/RC1971v040n07ABEH001939 · DOI
  161. Jiang Q., 2020, Small, 16, 2001704, 10.1002/smll.202001704 · DOI · Paper page
  162. Liang H., 2021, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 143, 15812, 10.1021/jacs.1c07471 · DOI
  163. Chen Q., 2019, Adv. Sci., 6, 1802134, 10.1002/advs.201802134 · DOI
  164. Yu G. T., 2018, Adv. Funct. Mater., 28, 1801389, 10.1002/adfm.201801389 · DOI
  165. Rao L., 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 2004853, 10.1002/adma.202004853 · DOI
  166. Liu L., 2020, Small, 16, 2003543, 10.1002/smll.202003543 · DOI
  167. Proneth B., 2019, Cell Death Differ., 26, 14, 10.1038/s41418-018-0173-9 · DOI
  168. Massoud T. F., 2003, Genes Dev., 17, 545, 10.1101/gad.1047403 · DOI
  169. Thangam R., 2021, Nanomaterials, 12, 18, 10.3390/nano12010018 · DOI
  170. Sathuvan M., 2022, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 194, 563, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.099 · DOI
  171. Constantine G., 2004, Lancet, 363, 2162, 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16509-4 · DOI
  172. Lutz A. M., 2004, Radiology, 233, 149, 10.1148/radiol.2331031402 · DOI
  173. Padhani A. R., 2002, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 16, 407, 10.1002/jmri.10176 · DOI
  174. McRobbie D. W., 2017, MRI From Picture To Proton, 10.1017/9781107706958 · DOI
  175. Benyettou F., 2020, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 142, 18782, 10.1021/jacs.0c05381 · DOI
  176. Nie W., 2019, ACS Nano, 13, 1469, 10.1021/acsnano.8b07141 · DOI
  177. Du Y., 2019, Nano Lett., 19, 3618, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00630 · DOI
  178. Kang H., 2018, Acta Biomater., 78, 365, 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.039 · DOI
  179. Kang H., 2017, Handbook of Intelligent Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 59
  180. Singh N., 2021, Chem. Soc. Rev., 50, 12883, 10.1039/D1CS00559F · DOI
  181. Thu M. S., 2012, Nat. Med., 18, 463, 10.1038/nm.2666 · DOI
  182. Lu C.-W., 2007, Nano Lett., 7, 149, 10.1021/nl0624263 · DOI
  183. Hoehn M., 2002, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 99, 16267, 10.1073/pnas.242435499 · DOI
  184. Sharma B., 2021, Adv. NanoBiomed Res., 1, 2100019, 10.1002/anbr.202100019 · DOI
  185. Park S., 2021, Sci. Rep., 11, 1, 10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8 · DOI
  186. Yun S., 2018, Nano Lett., 18, 838, 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04089 · DOI
  187. Wang Q., 2020, ACS Nano, 14, 2053, 10.1021/acsnano.9b08660 · DOI
  188. Tu Z., 2022, Nat. Rev. Mater., 7, 1, 10.1038/s41578-021-00410-z · DOI
  189. Dellacherie M. O., 2019, Nat. Rev. Mater., 4, 379, 10.1038/s41578-019-0106-3 · DOI
  190. Kang H., 2018, Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol., 44, 1F, 10.1002/cpsc.44 · DOI
  191. Dalby M. J., 2018, Nat. Rev. Mater., 3, 1, 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.91 · DOI
  192. Shih Y.-R. V., 2014, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 990, 10.1073/pnas.1321717111 · DOI
  193. Dai C., 2019, Biomaterials, 219, 119374, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119374 · DOI
  194. Poon W., 2019, ACS Nano, 13, 5785, 10.1021/acsnano.9b01383 · DOI
  195. Li X., 2016, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 104, 1285, 10.1002/jbm.a.35654 · DOI
  196. Cardoso V. F., 2018, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 7, 1700845, 10.1002/adhm.201700845 · DOI
  197. Ottersbach A., 2018, Biomaterials, 155, 176, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.012 · DOI
  198. Lee J.-R., 2020, Sci. Adv., 6, eaaz0952, 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0952 · DOI
  199. Shih Y.-R., 2015, Acta Biomater., 19, 1, 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.017 · DOI
  200. Xia Y., 2018, Biomaterials, 183, 151, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.040 · DOI

200 of 220 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 29

Metadata

Authors
Ko, M. J., Hong, H., Choi, H., Kang, H., & Kim, D.
Venue
Advanced NanoBiomed Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-09-15
Volume
2
Issue
11
ISSN
2699-9307
DOI
10.1002/anbr.202200053
Cited by
29
References
3
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2020R1C1C1011038)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA218659)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB026207)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review