Cited by 386Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

High‐Rate Oxygen Electroreduction over Graphitic‐N Species Exposed on 3D Hierarchically Porous Nitrogen‐Doped Carbons

He, Wenhui, Jiang, Chunhuan, Wang, Jiabo, Lu, Lehui·2014·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Nitrogen‐doped species (NDs) are theoretically accepted as a determinant of the catalytic activity of metal‐free N‐doped carbon (NC) catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). However, direct relationships between ND type and ORR activity have been difficult to extract because the complexity of carbon matrix impairs efforts to expose specific NDs. Herein, we demonstrate the fabrication of a 3D hierarchically porous NC catalyst with micro‐, meso‐, and macroporosity in one structure, in which sufficient exposure and availability of inner‐pore catalytic sites can be achieved due to its super‐high surface area (2191 cm 2 g−1) and interconnected pore system. More importantly, in‐situ formation of graphitic‐N species (GNs) on the surface of NC stimulated by KOH activation enables us to experimentally reveal the catalytic nature of GNs for ORR, which is of great significance for the design and development of advanced metal‐free NC electrocatalysts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201404333

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to SilkNCT obtained at 1050°C, SilkNCT obtained at 900°C contains more N, mostly active pyridinic N and graphitic N, which contribute to high activity toward electrochemical reaction.

    “Compared to SilkNCT obtained at 1050°C, SilkNCT obtained at 900°C contains obviously more N, where most of the N is active pyridinic N and graphitic N, which are proved to contribute to high activity toward electrochemical reaction (38, 39).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, W., Jiang, C., Wang, J., & Lu, L.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Changchun University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Lehui
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-10
Volume
53
Issue
36
Pages
9503-9507
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2161058762
Cited by
386
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, nitrogen-doped carbon, metal-free electrocatalysts, hierarchical porous carbon, 3D porous carbon, KOH activation, in situ generation, high surface area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review