The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin fibers and films
Abstract
The in vitro biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin was studied by incubating fibers and films with proteolytic enzymes (collagenase type F, α‐chymotrypsin type I‐S, protease type XXI), for times ranging from 1 to 17 days. The changes in sample weight and degree of polymerization of silk fibers exposed to proteolytic attack were negligible. However, tensile properties were significantly affected, as shown by the drop of strength and elongation as a function of the degradation time. Upon incubation with proteolytic enzymes, silk films exhibited a noticeable decrease of sample weight and degree of polymerization, the extent of which depended on the type of enzyme, on the enzyme‐to‐substrate ratio, and on the degradation time. Protease was more aggressive than α‐chymotrypsin or collagenase. Film fragments resistant to enzymatic degradation were enriched in glycine and alanine. FT‐IR measurements showed that the degree of crystallinity of biodegraded films increased. Soluble degradation products of silk films consisted of a range of peptides widely differing in size, deriving from the amorphous sequences of the silk fibroin chains. Biodegraded fibers showed an increase of surface roughness, while films displayed surface cracks and cavities with internal voids separated by fiber‐like elements. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 2383–2390, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Altman, G. H., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R. L., Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J., & Kaplan, D. L. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00353-8 · Cited by 3,458
Attachment and growth of fibroblast cells on silk fibroin
Minoura, N., Aiba, S. I., Higuchi, M., Gotoh, Y., Tsukada, M., & Imai, Y. (1995) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.1368 · Cited by 371
Self-citationIn vivo blood compatibility of regenerated silk fibroin.
Sakabe, H., Ito, H., Miyamoto, T., Noishiki, Y., & Ha, W. S. (1989) · Sen'i Gakkaishi · doi:10.2115/fiber.45.11_487 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Silk fibroin biomaterials for tissue regenerations
Kundu, B., Rajkhowa, R., Kundu, S. C., & Wang, X. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043 · Cited by 1,391
Structures, mechanical properties and applications of silk fibroin materials
Koh, L.-D., Cheng, Y., Teng, C.-P., Khin, Y.-W., Loh, X.-J., Tee, S.-Y., Low, M., Ye, E., Yu, H.-D., Zhang, Y.-W., et al. (2015) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.001 · Cited by 1,241
Silk fibroin as a functional biomaterial for tissue engineering
Sun, W., Gregory, D. A., Tomeh, M. A., & Zhao, X. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22031499 · Cited by 552
Degradation mechanism and control of silk fibroin
Lu, Q., Zhang, B., Li, M., Zuo, B., Kaplan, D. L., Huang, Y., & Zhu, H. (2011) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm101422j · Cited by 344
Crosslinking strategies for silk fibroin hydrogels: promising biomedical materials
Farokhi, M., Aleemardani, M., Solouk, A., Mirzadeh, H., Teuschl, A. H., & Redl, H. (2021) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/abb615 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Arai, T., Freddi, G., Innocenti, R., & Tsukada, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-15
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2383-2390
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2035519230
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 1.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.