Cited by 3,458Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsSilkworms and Sericulture Research

Silk-based biomaterials

Altman, Gregory H, Diaz, Frank, Jakuba, Caroline, Calabro, Tara, Horan, Rebecca L, Chen, Jingsong, Lu, Helen, Richmond, John +1 more·2003·Biomaterials

Abstract

Silk from the silkworm, Bombyx mori, has been used as biomedical suture material for centuries. The unique mechanical properties of these fibers provided important clinical repair options for many applications. During the past 20 years, some biocompatibility problems have been reported for silkworm silk; however, contamination from residual sericin (glue-like proteins) was the likely cause. More recent studies with well-defined silkworm silk fibers and films suggest that the core silk fibroin fibers exhibit comparable biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo with other commonly used biomaterials such as polylactic acid and collagen. Furthermore, the unique mechanical properties of the silk fibers, the diversity of side chain chemistries for 'decoration' with growth and adhesion factors, and the ability to genetically tailor the protein provide additional rationale for the exploration of this family of fibrous proteins for biomaterial applications. For example, in designing scaffolds for tissue engineering these properties are particularly relevant and recent results with bone and ligament formation in vitro support the potential role for this biomaterial in future applications. To date, studies with silks to address biomaterial and matrix scaffold needs have focused on silkworm silk. With the diversity of silk-like fibrous proteins from spiders and insects, a range of native or bioengineered variants can be expected for application to a diverse set of clinical needs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00353-8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altman, G. H., Diaz, F., Jakuba, C., Calabro, T., Horan, R. L., Chen, J., Lu, H., Richmond, J., & Kaplan, D. L.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, David L
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
401-416
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157908104
Cited by
3,458
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 162 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 169 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 187 · 2018: 178 · 2017: 198 · 2016: 204 · 2015: 207 · 2014: 231 · 2013: 191 · 2012: 171
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR046563, R01AR46563-01)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01 DE 13405-01, R01DE013405)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Silkworms and Sericulture Research
Keywords
silkworm silk, Bombyx mori, silk fibroin, biocompatibility, silk films, tissue engineering scaffolds, bone formation, ligament formation, fibrous proteins
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Adhesion, Fibroins, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Bombyx, Tensile Strength, Insect Proteins, Tissue Engineering, Silk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review