Cited by 27Polymer composites and self-healingAdvanced Materials and MechanicsAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies

Achieving shape memory: Reversible behaviors of cellulose–PU blends in wet–dry cycles

Luo, Hongsheng, Hu, Jinlian, Zhu, Yong, Zhang, Sheng, Fan, Ying, Ye, Guangdou·2012·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

Shape memory effect (SME) was achieved for cellulose–polyurethane (PU) blends of different compositions in wet–dry cycles, featuring that the amorphous cellulose and the PU content served as the fixing phase and the recovery phase, respectively. The dependence on the compositions of the fixity ratio and the recovery ratio was quantitatively measured by tensile tests. The morphological and thermal properties of the blends were further investigated by scanning electron microscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. The storage modulus of the blends varied reversibly in the wet–dry cycles, as determined by dynamic mechanical analysis. Furthermore, the microstructure of the blends reversibly changed correspondingly, as determined by wide‐angle X‐ray scattering diffraction and Fourier transform infrared. It was predicted that the reversible transition in different amorphous cellulose structures triggered by water led to the reversible variation in modulus as well as the wet–dry SME of the blends. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.36292

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Luo et al. prepared cellulose nanowhisker/SMPU nanocomposites with outstanding water-active SME; the cellulose nanowhisker in SMPUs did not affect the intrinsic thermal-active SME of the SMPU but enabled the SMPU water-active SME.

    “Basing on this idea, Luo et al. [411] prepared cellulose nanowhisker/SMPU nanocomposites with outstanding water-active SME.The cellulose nanowhisker in SMPUs did not affect the intrinsic thermal-active SME of the SMPU but enabled the SMPU water-active SME.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, H., Hu, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, S., Fan, Y., & Ye, G.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, Jinlian
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-26
Volume
125
Issue
1
Pages
657-665
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W2057054922
Cited by
27
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
Keywords
shape memory effect, wetting-drying cycles, recovery ratio, amorphous cellulose, storage modulus, microstructure, polymer blends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review